Quantum computing won't matter in the 2020s, but it will take damn near a decade to quantum proof the network.
I figure if we wait until it's clear that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer is less than 5 years away, we're pretty screwed.
Better to start preparing too early than too late.
Only one I'm aware of, works reasonably well: https://shop.lnbits.com/product/nostr-signing-device
Dentist: Do you floss?
Me: Do you use a unique password and hardware 2FA for every online account?
He's only certified to award PhDs for pleb slop.
Framework is such a nifty laptop.
You can swap out pretty much any compenent in a matter of minutes.
I upgraded my graphics card in 10 minutes and only had to remove 4 screws.
Any network. No human knows other than Satoshi, and no machine knows.
The network has no knowledge of which assets may being to its creator.
Centralized systems can upgrade to post quantum cryptography orders of magnitude faster than Bitcoin can.
That's why Bitcoin has to be far more proactive about the threat than other industries.
Citrea is a BitVM zero knowledge roll-up where all of the Ethereum VM computation happens on the Citrea network, which is a second layer on top of Bitcoin.
I hope you educate yourself further so that you don't make such ignorant statements in the future.
Is Nic Crater the hate child of Nic Carter and Matthew Kratter? 😅
Who promised you that?
No one has the authority or ability to make such guarantees.
I'm just happy we're finally back to arguing about actually interesting conundrums like quantum risks rather than retarded bullshit like spam. 😎
If something like my migration BIP activates then either Satoshi upgrades the locking scripts for their coins or they get frozen.
While my research suggests it should be possible to enable a recovery option for BIP32 wallets, there's no additional data available that JBOK wallets would be able to use to prove to the network that they aren't a quantum attacker.
Backwards compatibility with regard to forks is taken from the perspective of a node operator rather than a transactor, but yes. Perhaps a new term is necessary.
The likelihood of chain split decreases commensurate to the percentage of hashrate enforcing the soft fork.
You're conflating chain splits with backwards compatibility.
saylor seems to be advocating for a hard fork that forces people to move coin.
burning those who do not comply.
this breaks the fundamental social contract and value prop of bitcoin: sovereign ownership and property rights.
it must be opposed. strongly.
https://blossom.primal.net/09bdeb018313b0eeeca3d178fb0b183bd4fb75bb29df30bb7d0dfe79d12402ed.mp4
Don't worry Matt, it's all soft forkable!
It's rather important for criminals to have privacy... because we are all criminals.
Bitcoin Dev Mailing List Getting Filtered?
https://blossom.primal.net/88d7c16c58f2aac2afd703c0887ce7b6138e5c00801f37840158de4fa9d8fb16.mp4
Retard filter... ACTIVATE!
Why not both? 😬
I like huge OP_RETURNs
they reduce both blockchain and UTXO set data growth rates.
Why is it so fucking difficult to obtain pure, uncut, white cranberry juice?
The ossifiers will actively seek to prevent that.
Have Our Bitcoin Heroes Been Skin-Suited?
https://blossom.primal.net/85ceb032e00b3d6081d43fd64df7554ec6756a0a2706ca3a71c78259bc7fdff4.mp4
Betteridge's Law of Headlines states that any headline ending in a question mark can be answered with "no." This suggests that if a publisher were confident in a positive answer, they would have stated it as a fact rather than posing it as a question.
Primal would never do an airdrop.
Set up a new gaming PC with Windows 11.
Fuck Microsoft for trying to force you to have an online account tied to your operating system. And fuck their insane captcha system that I wasted half an hour trying to appease.
Eventually I got frustrated enough that I searched for the command line hack to disable the online registration requirement.
Woke Shipcoiner Supports Spam
https://blossom.primal.net/582634538074268d26e84646ab8fc79ad3af33bb95fa70ed33517cc0110344c4.mp4
Andreas is more of a Bitcoiner than you can ever hope to be.
He has educated more Bitcoiners than your faux university will ever reach.
I love the smell of government shutdown in the morning.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
- H. L. Mencken
He's probably busy building Bitcoin Knobs
We're so early that folks think Bitcoin is this level of odd.
Keep nostr weird. Let's get #buttsickles trending!
I went for a nice motorcycle ride earlier and am currently posting this while suspended between trees in a hammock. 🤗
That's the neat part, there isn't! Well, for larger than about 143 bytes IIRC. Bigger than that and it's cheaper to do witness stuffing.
If the Brits try to invade the US over this then you're goddamned right I'll be using my guns.
The proof of work contact form on my web site has a difficulty adjustment. I can it the annoyance adjustment. Any time I start getting annoyed by the volume of messages I receive, I bump up the difficulty.
I started off 5 years ago at about 30 seconds worth of hashes on a desktop CPU and now am up to 10 minutes.
Overhead: the Kelce-Swift engagement is like 9/11 for every guy in a long term relationship who hasn't proposed.
There is no amount of anger, crying, or virtue signaling that will defeat information theory. Accept it and move on.
https://blog.bitmex.com/the-unstoppable-jpg-in-private-keys/
Leaving the United States while on bail as a foreign citizen is rather rare as I understand it.
It's interesting that Netanyahu’s office issued a statement denying that the employee in question had even been arrested.
There's certainly fishiness in this story; hopefully more evidence arises.
Roasting ain't crying. You see ratio, I see engagement from a successful roast 😊
You chose to create news rather than report news. Understandable given the incentive to drive attention, but not really a best practice for journalism.
More specifically, you chose to interpret Google's (admittedly poorly worded) policy without actually doing the legwork of asking them first. Next, your article claimed self custody apps were being banned while providing zero actual examples.
As a self custody app publisher who pushes builds every few days, Casa is keenly aware of policy changes and we knew that no such interpretation was being applied upon us.
Your fearmongering caused some of our clients to freak out and flood our support team, questioning if Casa's app was going to abruptly disappear.
It's commendable that you got Google to clarify their policy. But I dare say it could have been achieved without the stress and drama.
You are always free to trust third parties to your own detriment 🤷🏼♂️