For anyone who still is brainwashed enough to swallow it, or who hasn’t done the simplest due diligence:
The Covid vaccine doesn’t protect you from getting COVID, doesn’t make it less severe, and does absolutely cause harm.
I’m sorry to anyone who believed the pharma marketing.
I have few regrets and this is one of them
nostr:note15xshh4jdc26yk85ffdx53p7hsxfcvfsvmyp3pu4fpe3gde48m6xswhkdua
nostr:note199gjplgs2pj7g9g5m3xlqg5w76awuu4hxkmf6r9q7fm50qhm9yvqrcnq5n
i've heard lots of things. i haven't seen actual sources though. is there real evidence of this?
the people I say seeing this (before I deleted X) are the same people still clamoring on about the satanic panic and similar bullshit conspiracies.
i'm open to evidence.
Literally the very Pfizer trial documents support this. More people died in the vaccinated group than the placebo. They arbitrarily hand waved away the deaths as “unrelated” without investigating and the FDA just said “ok cool.”
I wouldn't expect too much intellect from nostr users on this. The #pandemic hashtag is still full of pandemic denialists and devoid of actual posts by nostr users about the ongoing COVID pandemic
Here’s some starter info:
The PCR test or the nose swab thing that was being done to tell people if they had “covid” or not is not actually a diagnostic test at all. It’s a tool to replicate a bunch of nucleotides so that nurses/doctors can analyze with a greater number of molecules. This video explains what the test is supposed to be used for. In summary, the PCR test never actually tested for covid. It just multiplied anything that it found. Kary Mullis is the inventor of this test.
Well after the PCR technique you search for viral DNA/RNA you want in the sample, and if you have a sample with large amounts (in proportion to the rest of the sample, because you replicated the whole thing) of viral DNA/RNA, it means that the virus you are searching for is replicating itself (therefore, you have an active infection). Viral PCR is a very reliable and accurate way to identify active viral infection, but PCR per se is just the technique :)
the thing you are missing in your understanding is they are searching for a marker, not the whole chemical signature of the virus, and many markers that are specific to something are found in enough of an amount in almost every sample that at best it indicates you were around someone recently, maybe, who was shedding the virus, which can also be because of having taken a vaccine
it is not a reliable method of detecting infections because it's indistriminate, it's like taking an audio sample where the signal is at most like 6 or 7 magnitude and then trying to make out speech from that level of imprecision
it's very useful for the original thing it was devised to do - extract DNA from stingy sources like hair or fossils, it's useless at finding positive signs of infection
That is a great point to keep in mind, but you should also consider the probability of having a false positive (which is what you described, detecting virus RNA without having infection) in this setting.
Every DNA/RNA that enters your bloodstream is degraded almost instantly (that’s why our body cells keep the DNA in the nucleus, away from the degrading enzimes). That’s what your immune system is constantly doing, it degrades everything and creates immunity.
For you to be able to identify a specific DNA/RNA strand in PCR, it has to be a huge amount of it floating around your bloodstream, and it must be released faster than your immune system can degrade it. And it has to be so many copies of that RNA/DNA that you can even detect it in other samples that aren’t blood (like the nose swab).
That only happens if you have a viral pathogen actively replicating and releasing millions of DNA/RNA copies per second (aka an active viral infection).
So this is why you don’t test positive for covid PCR after you take the vaccine (because your immune system took care of it all and the copies just aren’t enough to show up on the PCR). And that is why you don’t test positive for viral PCR right after you had contact with someone with a viral infection - you don’t have enough viral RNA/DNA in your sample, because the virus hasn’t made millions and millions of copies (yet, maybe after a couple of hours you will test positive).
You just don’t happen to have just enough covid DNA/RNA in your nose to test positive in PCR, that is not how it works (your immune system would not just ignore that and let it float around). False positive results can happen of course (nothing is set in stone). But in this setting, speccially with PCR technique, there’s almost 0 chance that happens. So much so the most common errors with PCR are the false negatives, not the false positives.
PCR is the most reliable and accurate test we have for viral infections.
the discoverer of the technique strongly disagrees with your thesis, i recommend you read what he says
each type of viral infection has specific metabolic markers, and the only reliable virus infection detection method at minimum requires blood samples, some more than others
i am not talking out of my hat here, until this PCR/mRNA "vax" bullshit started i had on several occasions had full pathology tests of viruses and they had to take about 10ml of my blood to do it
you can't find viruses without a blood sample, or, if the virus does not travel in blood, a biopsy of the tissue it infects
it is true that viruses can travel through mucus and other fluids such as from sinus, genital, and other excreted fluids (including mixed in with excreta and urine and in tears, saliva, such as the nasal and oral secretions that are used for this "covid" test, but the number of particles required to impart an infection is so small that the chances of detecting anything in these locations is near enough to zero, in real world, actual situation
the PCR tests are NOT meant for virus detection, they are meant for DNA detection, and that's the main use, and will always be the main use, in criminal forensic pathology
there is even, for years now, special alarm systems that emit a spray containing a distinctive DNA sequence, that can be used as part of evidence to locate a person as having been physically in a place with such an alarm system, and the PCR test is required to determine if they were exposed to this distinctive sequence of DNA
but when you are walking around and the spit and slobber and nasal mucus of people is floating around in teh air, on the doorknobs, and seats and touchscreens and buttons of ATMs, you can have this virus on you in such a way as that one particle gets in your nose, which can't infect you, and then you go to a PCR testing thing to get a swab and oh, we found a particle of covid on you
NO SHIT IT"S EVERYWHERE
doesn't mean anything, is an utterly utterly useless form of diagnostic, at best you could use one to say "maybe if this tests positive and they seem sick we should do a blood test"
it's NOT a useful diagnostic alone
the entire scheme of this protocol with covid was a complete sham, total fuckery and quackery and propaganda
The blood samples are used for serology tests, where you find antibodies against viruses. It is also very useful, but your imune system takes time to create those antibodies (up to 4 weeks). Using PCR to detect active viral infection (before you can detect antibodies) is faster, easier and cheaper. If you had a symptomatic person with covid and did serology tests, you would find antibodies in the bloodstream. However, since covid spreads before the symptoms start, if you waited 4+ weeks to diagnose an individual and isolate it from the comunity, it would be a waste of time since that person spent the whole excretion time walking around and spreading covid. So they used PCR instead.
exactly
using PCR on a fast spreading virus is literally useless
the whole thing was a fraud, i am wondering why i followed you when you clearly don't see this
But if you detect it in time you can isolate the carrier and stop the spreading! Reducing the spreading is better than doing nothing because there are individuals who are more fragile and could really suffer from the disease
yeah, a bit like jailing everyone who was within 1km of a murder, when you aren't even certain that the perp has had the time to get outside of that boundary
it's not effective to be excessively punitive on people over a FUCKNIG COLD VIRUS
don't waste your time trying to explain why i am wrong because i literally spent 3 days in the typical covid anaphylaxis, i beat that virus and i have barely been as sick as this since, and before, it was the same as ever, something that happens every 5 years or so, big FUCKING DEAL
fuck off with your praise of PCR and lockdowns, you are literally retarded
did you watch the video i linked? the inventor himself says that the test doesn’t tell you if you’re sick or if the infection you ended up with is actually going to hurt you. quite shocked i can still find this on youtube
I did! But “being sick” can have many interpretations. In the most common use, being sick is having symptoms from a disease or infection. So that conclusion doesn’t shock me: having an active viral infection is not equal to having symptoms, so a positive PCR doesn’t mean being sick.
The hurting part is also true, you can have an active infection and simply not suffer from it (if you have a good imune system, that happens most of the time).
I don’t think the video contradicts what I said about viral PCR being a good method.
Plenty of evidence. Here's one place to start. It's not a study, but puts those shots into context with other pharma products and gives a fair amount of background on their development.
There's so much more; if you're genuinely curious, it really doesn't take a lot of digging.
I’ll look into it thanks
Mind boggling that there are people on nostr that have yet to come to this conclusion end of 2024. And then they expect us to provide them with evidence. Go do the work yourself as it will 'sink in' far greater than anything we provide.
I’ve seen nothing but bullshit to be honest. The burden is on the one making the claim.
Fauci lied…people died.
Getting over your skis a bit there - biochemistry is not a hobby thing: proof of work and all right?
This feels a bit like a “listen to the experts” appeal. When I’m using the Pfizer trials and our only half decent record for vaccine side effects to make this simple and obvious conclusion.
I had a high school friend who died from an “undiagnosed” heart condition weeks after his fourth round of the shot. This was in September of 2022. He got caught up in the hysteria because his girl friend at the time had lupus so he was worried about her getting sick. Obviously, we don’t know for sure if the shot caused it because nobody fucking looked into it.
No its not simple and obvious, that's the point, you are over confident.
Might make it less severe on average, actually.
But it does cause harm as a bioweapon, and the worst part is instead of defeating the COVID bioweapon, it convinced all the retarded lemmings to stop masking and social distancing, which both actually help.
lol... nice troll. How much is the pharmaceutical industry paying you to post such garbage?
As much as they pay me to tell you to kill yourself for calling me a troll - none, retard.
Contrary to my other reply, I kinda hope instead of killing yourself you simply wake up a bit and realize being against mass murder doesn't make me a troll or a big pharma shill (or fucking both)
Hard to know if it reduced severity since everything recorded about a person's vax status starts 2 weeks after each shot. Thus folks who get a shot and get a bad case of whatever (something that tests as covid) are still counted as unvaxxed if the illness happens in that window.
This one rather brilliant tweak to the data creates so much statistical noise that we basically know nothing about the ability of the jabs to do anything.
Anthony?
Very proud of my ability to do critical thinking while most were panicking.
https://medium.com/@FF2K/public-enemy-21-exerting-my-bodys-freedom-to-opt-out-d82222b3da28
I was amazed watching the majority of the friends who I've encouraged to educate themselves on bitcoin (and who never purchased any), line up for the experimental clotshots and boosters. We need more people with the ability to critically think, and the balls and conviction to stand for something.
The vaccines are also developed to address prior strains and not able to fully alleviate against new emerging variants. It’s no different than the flu shot and has very limited efficacy. People are free to choose whatever makes them comfortable but good to objectively look at data and debate
Virology is pseudo science. Contagion is a myth. This is where the "verify" of "don't trust, verify" is available for anyone who is willing to develop sane lifestyle habits. You can be around "infected" people all day long without any fear of evil spirits entering your body from another person. If your kitchen is clean, you will not have roaches.
So the polio and measles vaccines are a hoax and people suffering from these diseases coincidentally declined at the same time as the vaccines were introduced?
At the same time, no, before.
1) What was the reason for an increase in measles cases a few years ago in unvaccinated populations in the US? Or was that all part of the conspiracy?
2) Every medical professional who has worked on viruses and vaccines since, what, the ‘60s or ‘70s has been deceived or wilfully lied about their efficacy?
Pharma marketing? A reminder that a lot of us had to be vaccinated to keep their job. I agree with most of your statements but don’t tell me it’s because I was brainwashed
I was not forced to take the clot shot to keep my job. But if it had been mandated, I would have forced them to fire me. No job is worth the health risk of taking it. No matter what you do for a living.
So far I consider I made the right choice. There may be health risks but I haven’t see any impact yet
I’m specifically referencing people who believe it protects you from COVID and is perfectly safe with no consequences. If it doesn’t include you, then it doesn’t include you.
Santa is eliminating his naughty list
nostr:note1x74y3c582sk2ltwe2sf09lya62y8mkzg9q3zlztzf2004xujftcqaej5et
I don’t think you’ll find much pushback on that point here
