I always want evidence before i do something important.
To paint a small picture about me. We can start with Covid as you mentioned it. I did not get vaccinated when vaccine first came out. When some reasonable serious data came out and i was "ok, i'm ok with taking it", i already got covid 3 times (3 different strains, first strain was 3rd big mutation....as we called it than "UK mutation") and i had zero reasons to do it after that. When i got first one, i was really fucked up, it was Flue++. I lost my sens of taste for 2 months (which turned out to be worst of it all). After all that, i had natural defense and mutations were getting less and less aggressive so i had no reason to take vaccine no matter what data said.
As far as lockdowns go, yes i supported them in that short time we had no idea what's going on. Big reason for that is that i live near Italy where shitload of people died at start of it all. Some people i knew personally. Once covid mutated first time, i changed my mind as situation has changed and after that moment i was against lockdowns. I still stand behind my original stance and after my changed. I pride myself to be someone who can change his mind when situation changes.
Most of countries did not shut them down as fast as they should have. My country included and i basically started to ignore it. Simply went where i wanted and did what i usually did, with extra care for others. If i was sick, i wore mask. Not for my protection but to minimize exposure of others to my viruse or bacteria, whatever it was.
I am kind of person that skips on making big decisions and strong opinions without good reason. Saying: "i amnot sure i will make my mind later" is something i pride myself with.
That said, someones personal opinion, here say, feelings etc. is not good reason, at least for me and that is all we have as far as Charlies shooter goes. Once we get more data i will change my mind on him. But i don't see posibility that "left" is responsiible in any way, shape or form, as "left" is simply term that describes way too large group that simply can not be responsible.
Imagine this. I look at this video:
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsgfdj3d3na2rkstms52fxt02lxe82p2mxpcqv9d72z2jlysrpcr4sgnm9h9
And i say: "Right want's go kill innocent helpless people". Not one guy on Fox....no...Right. You included (if you are "right"). Cmon now....really? Is that correct way to communicate? Is that objective? You are better than this.
