Yes it was different, but peoples of this earth have moved from here to there all the time. And I don't think God meant us to have any borders, do you?
And what caused people to move, to act on this what you call self-immolation? Was that gluttony or indulgence or anything bad? People just want to live a better life. How much of a chance at a better life is there when your interest rates are 3x higher where you were born because the reserve currency is printed elsewhere?
I don't think so. I think people should just respect each other's beliefs. Public shaming is always an option. 
That's not controversial π
I think it's a good idea because there's a diversity of preference and diversity in options will address that. Minimalist clients are easy to make and will always be available, or any form can be formed anyway. I'm looking forward to seeing ever more diversity among clients.
I like your nuanced elaboration, is algorithmic feed something a client will want to offer soon or do you think clients will postpone creating it? Or do you think clients will be forced to implement algorithms?
Apples and oranges around the world, but I've seen how Americans get ticketed. They enforce by employing a disproportionate percentage of their population to police the others. It's not an answer to deal with the offense to begin with.
nostr:note14vuf7pmj8w4k9cgzgr8hp6cgl8xlm4prppjye4px4xdh7p89waps5ps5je
And another one is, how enforceable is all of that ticketing really? Employing 1/1000 people to police the others is proving to be ridiculously expensive and a much greater cost to society than the crimes they are meant to prevent.
Enforceability is key. Policy mindedness will be considered a dogma, because an unenforceable policy is a bad policy. Examples are speech and censorship, money trafficking and financial laws, drugs and drug prohibition, guns and banning firearms, copyright and patent law, all able to be circumvented without repercussion to serve the sovereign person regardless of policy.
To think your children will be able to live in a society that is able to ban such things our legal system considered crimes is a fallacy. Such as named above can't be considered crimes.
Crime is something else, it is the use of force against the will of another. Crime is not the possession or fabrication of a medium that makes a crime possible. Crime is always possible and punishing the act is enforceable.
Get ready for a mass breach of patent law through the loss of enforceability. It's already becoming difficult to stop goods from being produced in violation of patent law. It will become practically impossible to enforce laws that apply to the benefit of western countries when those western countries are no longer supplying the bulk of the revenue.
Thank you, happy to sketch.
Start following way more plebs, check out their notes. Pick what you like. And remember, this place isn't finished, using Nostr now is like moving into a house while it's under construction. There's a plumber in the kitchen, there's a carpenter in your roof, there's a plaster doing the drywall if your bedroom.
Are users going to be forced to view the menu in mirror image? that's wild π


