Avatar
Elephant in the root
6e77f4f3c9995e0887d02dc95b39692f58641ed5b073972ef86cd6b61ecc6bae
Poisonous anti-plantist, anti-fungist, anti-shitcoinist, anti-governmentalist, anti-wokist, anti-bullshitist.

Indeed. It's horrible hearing someone being punished so severely by what is likely an honest mistake while the obvious fraudster enjoys quite a good life in comparison.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

The Case for a Chain Split

The debate surrounding drivechains has been heating up, with proponents employing various tactics to garner support. This divisive issue echoes previous disputes in the Bitcoin community, such as the 2017 block size controversy. As such, we should consider what was then the definitive resolution: a chain split.

A significant portion of the Bitcoin community rejects drivechains, effectively blocking its implementation via a soft fork. Bitcoin's voluntary nature makes it resistant to hostile takeovers, despite claims that miners could force the change. Disagree with that last statement? Then let's put that to the test. We can resolve this posturing and propaganda by forking the code.

Here's how it would work: Code implementing drivechains would be released. Those who support the proposal can run this code. A transaction that goes against drivechain rules but adheres to pre-drivechain rules will trigger a chain split. Those running the drivechain software wouldn't be doing anything, but nodes that aren't can reject the drivechain chain by using the "invalidateblock" command. The result will be two distinct Bitcoins: one with drivechains and one without.

This approach was resolved the conflict we had in August 2017, when Bitcoin Cash split off from Bitcoin. Similarly, proponents and opponents of drivechains can either hold or sell their respective Bitcoins post-split. This would be a real-world test of control and game theory within the network.

I advocate for this split not just for potential profits, but also because it's a peaceful solution. It would let us see in real time how convicted the drivechain people are. Will drivechain miners support it if it means mining at a loss? A chain split would serve as a critical learning opportunity for the community, providing a clear answer to the ongoing debate. Ultimately, this will strengthen Bitcoin by showing the market how hard it is to change its properties.

So bring it on! Fork or shut up.

https://void.cat/d/SEbocwy3dabt6xJaaXM5Sk.mp3

Depends on the hashrate of the pro-drivechain miners but yes, I think you're right.

Yeah, pretty much but the exact numbers depend on the person. Some do well on 70% fat. And most people should likely eat around the upper end of your recommendation. 0.5g translates to around 1lb of beef per day for a 70kg person. That's super low from what I know.

How? I've never got one. Isn't it because you're sending too many messages? And maybe bypass them with AI or an army of Indian solvers?

Unless I missed something, some US citizens were among the victims.

Why not just force him to give back as much as possible?

One thing I love about Nostr is there needs to be no hate between various clients. We can use them interchangeably with the same keys. When I find my primary client doesn't work well in some cases I use another and then freely return back.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

# Addressing the Decline in Birth Rates

Global birth rates are in decline, a trend that governments find alarming. A dwindling population could lead to a host of economic and social issues, but the policy responses have been largely ineffective. Financial incentives for families, like direct payments, tax breaks, and subsidized child care, have been deployed, but with little impact. This reveals a deeper, fundamental issue.

To understand the decline, it's crucial to figure out why couples are having fewer children. The common responses are either a lack of interest or financial constraints. While we should respect the choice not to have children, it's the financial concern that needs addressing.

Having children has become an expensive undertaking. From medical costs related to childbirth to time off work, government-mandated expenses like car seats, and the added costs of larger living spaces and education, families are stretched thin financially. Even households with two earners often struggle to make ends meet, making it harder to consider expanding the family.

The decline of single-earner households, where one parent could stay home to raise children, can be traced back to the massive expansion of rent seeking. The bureaucratic state has increased massively in all sorts of industries, and the inflation that has funded their expansion has driven up all kinds of costs, including essential resources like health care, education and housing. Both parents often need to work just to maintain a moderate standard of living.

A significant reason for these inflated costs is the fiat monetary system. Inflation has eroded the savings and earning power of average families, compelling both parents to enter the workforce. Moreover, real estate prices have soared, making it challenging for families to afford larger homes that could accommodate more children.

In essence, the decline in birth rates is not a consequence of individual choice or even culture but a byproduct of a kleptocratic monetary system that has made child-rearing unaffordable. Unless structural changes are made to restore the financial viability of having larger families, any superficial policy incentives are unlikely to reverse the declining birth rates. These economic incentives are giving back to families just a tiny portion of what's being stolen through the fiat monetary system. Stopping this inflationary theft would empower families to have more children, but such a move would require political will that is currently lacking.

What we need is a new monetary system and the path is not through political reform, but through the adoption of a new money. Bitcoin really is the fix for low birth rates.

Learn more at fiatruinseverything.com

I think there could be a secondary effect of inflation on birth rates. Fertility seems to be decreasing over time which doesn't make sense from evolutionary standpoint. So it has to be the environment that damages people to the point of being unable to conceive.

And indeed, many people who stopped listening to fiat-funded pseudo-science and started eating differently, getting light exposure etc fixed their issues. nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak talks about this a lot.

And curiosly I know a couple that decided to postpone having children because of health issues unrelated to sex organs. They most likely could have children but found it irresponsible to have them before they heal. And funnily enough the issues seem to be preventable with better, non-fiat food according to the research.

I wonder how many similar couples are there? I guess not zero.

Yep, that's the "very old" case. Or something is logging very frequently, which indicates a problem.

Yeah, it could be interesting to make it easier somehow. But for the initial tests you still want mocks, automation and regtest. Testnet is better for manual tests.

Only if they are very, very old. Losing important information is much worse than a few MB of storage.