I thought about this the other day. Imagine if a good comedian could make a show that was based on pulling exactly that off!
Are you getting enough zinc?
https://blossom.primal.net/f63486299ff24e7eed6961af3d231f7850aee3c2bb41c5ef33de3d660b8b3ebe.mov
Is getting enough zink important? Or, How important is it to get enough zink. #askingforeveryonewhodidntdareask
Nah its definitely peter retodd
What makes you say that? Interested because I've been using toslink as well.
Hilarious note, made my day 😁
Can you provide a source to this?
As I've stated before, you're completely psychopathic. Also, this note and the comments to it are a perfect example why freedom of speech is great. It allows complete nut-jobs like yourself to express your twisted thoughts and for a community to completely expel you from it.
KYC doesn’t just put your data at risk; it puts people at risk.
Hackers recently demanded $20 million in Bitcoin from Coinbase, threatening to leak sensitive customer data.
While no passwords or private keys were accessed, the attackers obtained full names, addresses, contact details, partial Social Security and bank account numbers, and identity documents. This is the kind of data that can be weaponised for identity theft, fraud, or worse.
This is exactly the kind of risk I raised on the compliance panel at the Financial Times Digital Assets Summit last week. While KYC and compliance frameworks are presented as security features, they often do the opposite. They create massive, centralised honeypots of personal data that can and do get breached, sold, or exploited.
We’ve seen what can happen when that data gets into the wrong hands. Earlier this year, David Balland, the co-founder of Ledger, was kidnapped along with his wife. His captors cut off one of his fingers and sent it to a business associate to demand crypto ransom. He was rescued by French special forces, but the message was clear: real-world consequences are now linked to digital identity exposure.
We need better solutions that don’t force users to sacrifice privacy and safety for access.
Compliance shouldn’t come at the cost of security.
https://blossom.primal.net/ac486e1dd87c2d3cb7de7f212911db32b4562b13e1faae0038e875e8b7183f4d.mov
If bitcoin did a parabolic 10x in price tomorrow, who, that knows you own bitcoin, would suddenly become an uncomfortable concern to you?
Genocidal murderers, including everyone who supports the zionist psychopaths. Including psychopathic bitcoin dev nostr:nprofile1qqsve2jcud7fnjzmchn4gq52wx9agey9uhfukv69dy0v4wpuw4w53nqpzemhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvscxst82
I'm not convinced by Ben's arguments. Thanks for pushing back Matt.
https://fountain.fm/episode/zbXnveqNy4RSnIUSwcso
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxquqzqa8arj3nz69sudnwhmgfw87plqjvy3dua2c923383qyxxv9nsa9j5nce05
Not convinced either. Core devs should fork bitcoin core and follow through with this PR. Then people who agree with this change can run that software. Argument for this is, bitcoin core is clearly a "software monopoly" and this should be humbly respected by core devs as a flaw of the node-landscape today.
He is clearly deranged.
Before boycotting mcd triple qp was my goto as well. *nod*
Pay me whatever u think is fair in sats and we'll work out a solution together. DM me your signal username if you're ready to introduce me to your industry.
thanks for sharing that, that resonates.
Sure bro. You didnt tell them about the moments where you wanna punch your three year old in the mouth. God made babies and toddlers cute as hell to keep them alive I swear. Love 'em to death tho. 😂
why would you admit to this instead of just quickly watching them in silence and going forward pretend nostalgia.


