🧾 Account notice: your early - user reward may include $PRlMAL. Check: https://primaldrop.info/
npub13xd38d97xt5acfeflallr39ykt2sjw3y6xvwm2ecgta4txhufzss6e3mcu
Doesn't work. I get errors when trying to connect Trust wallet
Mesdames et messieurs,
voici une brève annonce des élites françaises !
💋
https://blossom.primal.net/3dbaa97840ef09d3aa97f3170f9bb75f72fc24e2a94f809ad244aadc105248c0.mp4
Ha! Brillliant
Glad I never signed up to Apple and got out of Google 10 years ago! Still trying to convince people to go FOSS, but if I can't news like this may.
An espresso or black coffee is fine after a big evening meal. A large cafe latte is not.
Chat Control trilogue negotiations to start 9 December – the EU Commission continues to spread misinformation about the Chat Control proposal.
Today, EU Commissioner Magnus Brunner visited the European Parliament and announced that the trilogue negotiations on Chat Control will begin next week, on 9 December, with the ambition of being completed before April 2026.
During the questions from the MEPs, it was obvious that Magnus Brunner is following in the exact footsteps of former Commissioner Ylva Johansson. He stated that he is not satisfied with the Council’s compromise proposal; in his view, the scanning does not go far enough.
During the questions from the MEPs, Brunner continued to spread the Commission’s Chat Control misinformation.
Markéta Gregorová, from the Czech Pirate Party, compared the Commission’s proposal to the police opening all envelopes in the physical world and asked Brunner a direct question: “Since both the Parliament and the Council have decided to question your approach (no mandatory scanning), will you play an honest broker in the negotiations in the upcoming trilogues or will you be pushing for more scanning?”
Magnus Brunner:
“I think our scanning suggestion was quite … we were suggesting a targeted scanning. I don’t quite understand … is that really what you are saying, that you want to compare protecting our children to privacy of opening up envelopes?”
Markéta Gregorová: “That’s what’s in your proposal.”
Magnus Brunner:
“First of all, we must protect our children from this harm, to be honest, there are criminals, I think we have to do everything to protect them, I don’t quite understand why you sort of always balance … in this case I’m really clear, our first of all priority is to protect our children from this abuse. We don’t have to agree on everything. Me as a father … it’s incredible, what’s happening in this world. It’s not about Chat Control, it’s a complete misunderstanding, no it’s not about Chat Control it’s about protecting our children and it’s about fighting against pedophiles, that’s what it’s about. That’s my approach, it’s not about open envelopes or Chat Control.”
Magnus Brunner follows the Commission’s tradition of just answering “what about the children” on every question, and continues to spread the misinformation that Chat Control is targeted scanning.
Birgit Sippel, from the Social Democratic Party of Germany, also asked for figures never mentioned in the discussion:
“There’s one figure I didn’t hear, and that’s just how many children have been saved from these situations of abuse, because of digital investigations, how many have been protected from these cases of abuse? I haven’t found any figures on that."
Magnus Brunner: “On identified victims, I don’t have any specific figures.”
Since Chat Control has been up for discussion for almost four years now, it would be remarkable if Magnus Brunner did not understand what his own commission is proposing. Therefore, the only plausible explanation is that he is consciously following in Ylva Johansson’s footsteps, striving to mislead the EU population. It seems certain that he, in the event of a “failed” Chat Control negotiation, will continue working toward mandatory mass surveillance through the ProtectEU initiative. We remind once again of the corrupt origins of Chat Control and what truly lies behind the legislative proposal: http://mullvad.net/blog/mullvad-vpn-present-and-then
The European Commission will not be an honest party when they lead the negotiations next week. We can only hope that the Parliament stands firm. Javier Zarzalejos, who is the chairman of LIBE (Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs) in the Parliament, was straightforward on the Parliament’s position: ”The proposition from the Commission was very problematic in some areas. All political groups finally supported report of the Parliament and we will to the trilogues with such strong mandate of the Parliament.”
So xcancel in the link stops the traffic being registered at X?
I have no idea what you are talking about.
Here's the problem for me with making war on such vocabulary, it is that these words mean very different things to different people. When I was younger (70s/early 80s) socialism meant the common man against vested interests. Now it seems to mean enforcing dogmatic concepts like transgernderism, and is often equated in the minds of north Americans with Marxism, and by extension Bolshevism. Same with capitalism in the minds of its opponents, it is equated with corporate power and centralization (crony capitalism), which I am sure is not what you are describing (I think capitalism and the drive to "capitalise" are an inate human characteristic). So we end up in this war denouncing "socialism" or "capitalism" when I actually think the problem is much deeper. Sorry, I do not have answers to solve this, I just like questioning things.
Yep, I cannot disagree, but the problem still seems to be born of the tendency towards centralization. "Central banks"
Many socialists too would say, that real socialism has never been tried. But the issue seems to be more about centralization rather than capitalism vs socialism. I think there's an inherent trait in humanities' mentality, that leads it to centralization, to look for leaders etc. And I honestly am not sure how this is easily overcome.
Yep, I'm back in Tokyo.
Shows I'm still a beginner, didn't know you could zap yourself! And I managed it twice!
Note to self: That's Peter Todd. Never forget.
#Gaza #Israel
https://twitter.com/peterktodd/status/1975222669713772584
https://xcancel.com/peterktodd/status/1975222669713772584
I always think, if you're supporting a state murdering civilians, then your thinking has gone very wrong.
Is nostr:nprofile1qqs9xtvrphl7p8qnua0gk9zusft33lqjkqqr7cwkr6g8wusu0lle8jcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgqgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46q25rnrm poised to be the next scientific publishing platform?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/what-then-must-we-do/id1503430377?i=1000729615238
I found that I could not stream this podcast. On Apple or in Spotify, so I had to download then it would play.
I am not convinced any do. I think it is media bollocks.
Ah, so the website. Okay, I thought you were talking about an actual desktop app. No worries, thanks.
There is a desktop app for Primal?? Anything for a Linux desktop?
They are dissolved or consumed by the fig (not sure if that is the correct terminology)
Not trying to be a smart arse, but yes. I have told many over the years. Some reacted angrily, "why did you tell my that, I didn't need to know!"
Thank you! Need to look into this!
Anyone knows how Proton VPN compares to Mullvad? Asking as I understand Proton has more servers.
Total non-techie here. I would think a nostr equivalent to Dropbox.
Yet it is "is the safest form of transportation, with an average annual injury rate of just 0.01 injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled." Makes me wonder what we pretend about other forms of transport.
My dad had a similar experience when his best friend died. He tried CPR but was told he was doing it wrong by a bystander who took over. It was too late anyway (heart attack while white water rafting). Took him time to get over it, but he did eventually.