Dude this is just to be as insulting as possible in a clearly rigged court, imo. Are you fucking serious?
WUT THE FUCK
?cid=9b38fe91fwdq3g2bcukh7g6hf0l428tl6ryzu5kthjf0o94v&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g nostr:note1uyfulgzkptk0qf0ktw37wassf8ka0ztmguj84x2xlehhj6v4az9qxne79y
Eh, it's also why humanity works to begin with. It just doesn't scale very well.
Constantly hating on Saylor and fanboying for Saylor are two sides of the same coin, imo...
Giving too much importance and attention to any random thing he says. It's cool if he says something valuable, and whatever if he says something silly. The average person is going to have the same tumultuous journey as everyone else and I've come to realize that there's probably no great shortcut. 🤷🏻♂️
I've kind of come to the same place with that sort of thing as I have with shitcoins. I used to spend SO much time and energy trying to explain why it's stupid and everyone was going to lose their money... now i just don't care. It's a waste of my time and it never seemed to work anyway. I just make my case to anyone who will listen.
It will suffice from a security standpoint if you know how to maintain it, secure it, and not lose it.
I think most people discount just how unprepared and "tech security illiterate" the average person is. Yet many have decent amounts of money and want to get into #Bitcoin. In this case the "simple" solution is highly likely to result in disaster.
Example, someone I've been talking to who have been buying bitcoin just lost his phone twice in 2 months, got tricked into buying rallycoin by coinbase jsut before they delisted it so he can't get rid of it, and now thinks he sent bitcoin to his green wallet but it never showed up (i still ahve to investigate this one).
The guy wants to put his savings into bitcoin but his life is pretty crazy and I honesly don't feel safe telling him to do this unless I can make him a setup that's easy to understand and recover from WHEN those things happen. I think the best option is to distribute among many devices.
This would be part of the benefit of multisig. A single set of seed words don't threaten your bitcoin and so you can still move them if a key has gotten compromised.
I think that's a little like saying that using training wheels is setting people up for not being able to ride a bike.
I think making the presumption that learning and taking responsibility aren't incremental processes (when i think there's ample evidence that it is like any other learning process) is a great way to just get a lot of people to be too afraid to take the first step, imo.
THE AUDIOBOOK IS LIVE! 🔥
@knutsvanholm & @lukedewolf's new book now has a published audible ready ready to listen!
For those looking to understand the rise of Clown World 🤡🌎 and how we can find our way out of it, this one shouldn't be missed 👏
Anything that improves how you use taproot would be a big help. And just implementing naive multisig setups and making it the norm would build the pressure for things like FROST to get adopted.
Nunchuk will soon I think. nostr:npub1cvqlzvmjercdn0ypsmv8f7j9lge6ahsnueh5rparh53wuswftv4q49yjt3
This would be more for people who want to use their bitcoin or are on a bitcoin standard.
I think they are referring to the key design not anything about the service specifically. It’s a man obscured multisig with the intent of making it easy and safer for casual users.
Setups should be thought as as varying levels of multisig in complexity and sovereignty.
As I mentioned with nostr:npub1vgldyxx7syc30qm9v7padnnfpdfp4zwymsyl9ztzuklaf7j5jfyspk36wu, let’s say you have someone who’s buying their first bitcoin. You just onboarded your friend basically.
Well then maybe the setup should be that you have a key, your friend has a key, and the wallet provider has a key. That way this person can come back to you and still recover funds in case anything goes wrong.
It leverages local trust, instead of some huge, distant corporate (or scam wallet) trust model.
Then this can have all sorts of default variations based on the level of user skill and knowledge. 3/7 for someone who really needs help, but has a ton of funds, and has a spouse/friend they trust with a device also. Use tapsigners for main keys because they are super easy and have no input or UI complexity. They always work and you just keep them in your wallet. Multiple options for recovery, and to them it’ll look like just “tap to sign” because their phones auto sign with a local key too.
This way if they lose their phone, tapsigner, and additional key, it can still be recovered through their group. The UX challenge for something like that is mostly in the setup process.
But then there’s all sorts of options in between. As well as timelocks in the case of too many keys lost, let recovery still be possible on one key, with a 3 month delay, etc.
Just lots to explore and it could be hidden for the user behind, “just have these devices” or “just have this person confirm,” or “just tap this card,” etc.
You could have the additional key be offered by the person who onboarded you too 🤔
Like an “affiliate + key assistance” system. As long as they understand the trust model, this could be an interesting idea.
Also I think a way to hold the “backup” key with a friend or spouse using Apple keychain or Google password whatever would be critical. I think having them use an entirely different app and download it would be a bit friction for someone who didn’t have any bitcoiner friends. But if you could have a way to have a secure keychain encrypted key or something, and your wife or friend could just scan a QR and unlock something for you, that would be good UX. They wouldn’t even have to know what keys are being used or where. They just know that their Apple account has the keys to help get your coins back. 🤔🤔
Something there I think.
Sucks, I wish people could just open their eyes and see politicians for what they are… prostitutes for the corporations that fund them.
The fact that everyone buys this huge charade of bullshit is still just mind blowing when you see it for what it is. And she’s one of the worst.
It’s crazy that what gets you elected is literally the most excruciatingly ignorant and shallow condition possible… “do people recognize the name, and is there a slightly positive or negative association?”
And people wonder why this system produces constant streams of dogshit 😂
It’s when they need to add in the time machine that most people just slack off.
?cid=9b38fe919h7l7f9w02xiz54uz6ukmss576wx87nhx6nrp4uk&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
I do not argue against that
True-ish, except taproot.
You’ve been invited to join Holesail.io as a Peer.
To connect, paste this link into Keet.io, the unstoppable P2P chat app:
pear://keet/yrb5mmy5y84mq7m38whssiayg6otuoby4ogidyd5f8ft4qh5wh5tscu4pmiakkpksq6mjod8otqtj3jyut3ppxgg3idzcryqneekhrhhnqgm1ju8
See you there! Invite expires at 2024/11/2 23:45 UTC.
Can you link me to a good resource for digging into blossom?
My price target is that no pure fiat currency can be purchased with #Bitcoin because no one will buy it.
The only “fiat” that will survive will be those where countries backed it with BTC and they will simply be various denominations of sats. Fiat will basically become a state run satscard system. nostr:note15rrutrukfd76ml27qm4qaw899hvlfeu2sxjpytgn2n2ptl2v3y5qk7z9p2
It was taking the blood of someone who hadn’t been grounded for a whole day, and then again after 30 minutes grounded.
So they didn’t artificially apply anything. It was a before and after look at the cells and how they interacted.
Then I don’t understand what your comment was referencing. I assumed the context was about needing state control, and you were giving an example of where it was necessary.
Maybe expand on the context of what you mean, because I still can’t come up with anything else.
Why don’t you try a democratic company with your own funds and resources that you own and just see how it goes?
Nobody is stopping anyone from doing that. 🤷🏻♂️
YES! WANT!! ❤️ 
What do I get if you already follow me? 🤔
Per the recommendation from nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcjgxv3n I picked up a copy of #globalbrain.
Gonna start reading it next.
👏🏻👏🏻
Each of the boosters moves independently and you can watch them while they do. And there are correcting thrusters toward the top. You can see them fire every so often in most videos of the rockets landing.
This wasn’t an answer to my question though. So in your thinking all of the smaller rockets that have been doing this for years are fake too? What are your thoughts on starlink internet? Is that just fake or are they just lying about how they get them into orbit?
Curious, do they think that starlink is fake satellite internet also, and/or that the rockets that take those up and land back on their landing sites is all fake as well? 🤔
I don’t quite see the point of such an elaborate faking and doing it over and over again thinking they wouldn’t get caught.
Damn, super curious of the story behind this one
Sometimes the cognitive dissonance of losing out on the opportunity of a lifetime is enough to get us to latch onto any and every excuse as to why it was still the right decision.
Logic will not be what gets him to realize his mistake, because he needs 1/100th as good of an excuse not to believe it, in order to hold onto his own view of who he is.
Sucks, but that guy will probably be one of the very last to accept it... or he may literally die an old man angry at how the new generations are all using that stupid digital money about to be killed by quantum computing.
No, but only because the pattern in the model is derived from HUGE amounts of training data.
The normal back and forth of Q&A with the model is inference, or running it through the compressed patterns to transform it. But that specifically has no relationship to either compression or decompression, imo.
The part that is “compression” is when you take a million images of a cat and train a model that can understand the “pattern” of a cat. Then later you can get it to recall it, but it can’t reproduce any EXACT cat picture, only the characteristics shared by many of them.
In other words, the model has stored as extremely lossy compression of the concept of a cat, and translated your words describing one, into a pattern of pixels that *looks* like one.
