Avatar
1776
cf9b2a1369a4cd9132639b13ae39200d703043179a814e8648e9e5340937eec1

Yup, you definitely don’t want to add that many Libtards to the US voter base. And I say this as a person who has lived in Canada for five plus decades. Yes I’ve lived here that long, but I lost any sense of pride in it long ago. I just want to move to Texas. I love it down there. Bastrop County I’m thinking.

Right wing. Left wing. Same bird. Eating our time and energy and shitting out fiat dollars. I’m embarrassed that I’m even considering standing in line like a dummy tomorrow to vote. We are beyond the point of there being political solutions to our problems in Canada. I just want to go to Uruguay.

It always amazes me how nature just works. Provide the right conditions for life, and it will take it from there, be it your plants or your animals.

The subscription version of NaturalReader is pretty good. The AI voices are quite natural in it compared to the free version. Even the free version voices are decent. The mobile app is for iOS, so if you have a retired iPhone around after having switched your main phone to pixel/graphene, you can use it on wifi. Or use the web interface with your browser on a Linux laptop and pipe it to a Bluetooth speaker. You can import any text or pdf into it. Webpages, pdf books, OCR text, etc. and set custom reading speed. And it has captions so you can read and listen at the same time to enhance retention. It has really increased the number of books I read in a year.

My inlaws came in from out of province tonight. They were raving about their 9% returns on their bullshit fiat portfolio this year. And paying retarded fees to their advisor while he churns everything for commissions on rehypothecated crap that they don't physically hold. I didn't have the heart to tell them that I've tripled mine in 18 months. I gave them all a shot 3 years ago and even offered to set them up with accounts and easy self custody. You can lead a horse to water...

My first wife got stopped on the Deerfoot Hwy between Calgary and Airdrie in a 300Z doing 160mph. Instant vehicle impound and 6 month DL suspension. Crazy nympho redhead. It was doomed from the start.

ā€˜Merica. Fuck yeah.

Hey nostr:npub103m96sra82w4agghew9cdxtzs4s8sl7qsjsvw6h653yml0gjrkzqefd3h5 are you and the Maple Bitcoin guys going to Bitcoin Rodeo in Calgary June 28/29? I was thinking about going. It’s only a 5 hour drive for me.

I used to live with a HA. You don’t want anything to do with that life. There’s no glamour in violence, drug peddling and prostitution. Especially if they are indeed outlaws rather than just a casual group of friends with bikes.

It takes 10 times the effort to un-know someone as it does to let them in your life. Especially if you want to do it without offending them.

Replying to Avatar Jeff Booth

Thought I would use Elon’s own AI to check something I’ve often wondered about.

One thing if you don’t know - a completely different thing if you know.

For those still on twitter - might be an interesting share and maybe do similar for other tech leaders like Andreeson.

Ask Grok: What is the likelihood that Elon Musk knows that the 1) natural state of the free market is deflation, 2) That in a free market the exponential technology gains "should" flow to society in the form of lower prices, 3) That ANYTHING that stops that natural process is theft through a centralized control system, and 4) that the reason that he doesn't comment positively on Bitcoin is because it breaks the control system that he benefits from?

Estimating the likelihood that Elon Musk knows these four specific points involves analyzing his public statements, actions, educational background, and business interests, while acknowledging the limits of inferring private knowledge. Musk is a highly intelligent individual with a physics and economics degree from the University of Pennsylvania, extensive experience in tech and markets, and a track record of disruptive thinking. Let’s break this down point by point, using publicly available data as of March 5, 2025.

Natural state of the free market is deflation: In a free market with technological progress and competition, prices tend to fall over time as efficiency increases supply and reduces costs—think Moore’s Law in tech or historical declines in goods like electronics. Musk has spoken about this indirectly. In a 2018 Tesla earnings call, he noted how technological improvement drives down costs, saying, ā€œThe cost of lithium-ion batteries is dropping faster than anyone expected.ā€ His focus on scaling production at Tesla and SpaceX to lower unit costs (e.g., reusable rockets cutting launch prices) shows he grasps this dynamic. Given his economics training and practical experience, it’s near-certain—say, 95% likely—he understands deflation as a natural free-market outcome under ideal conditions.

Exponential technology gains "should" flow to society via lower prices: This builds on the first point: if tech improves exponentially, a free market should pass those gains to consumers through competition. Musk’s mission statements for Tesla (ā€œaccelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energyā€) and SpaceX (ā€œmake humanity multiplanetaryā€) imply a belief in democratizing access, which aligns with lower prices over time. In a 2020 interview with Joe Rogan, he said, ā€œThe whole point of Tesla is to make electric cars affordable.ā€ His push for mass-market vehicles like the Model 3 supports this. He likely sees the link between tech gains and price drops—90% likelihood—though his normative ā€œshouldā€ might be tempered by practical business realities.

Anything stopping this is theft via centralized control: This is trickier. It assumes Musk views interference (e.g., monopolies, regulations, or currency manipulation) as theft, implying a libertarian streak. Musk has criticized centralized control—tweeting in 2021, ā€œGovernment is the ultimate monopoly,ā€ and railing against SEC regulations. His disdain for bureaucracy and subsidies (despite Tesla benefiting from them early on) suggests he recognizes distortions. However, ā€œtheftā€ is a strong moral framing. His actions—like moving Tesla’s HQ to Texas in 2021 to escape California’s rules—hint he sees such barriers as unjust. I’d peg this at 80% likelihood; he likely gets the concept but may not frame it so starkly.

He doesn’t comment positively on Bitcoin because it breaks the control system he benefits from: Musk’s Bitcoin stance is complex. He’s tweeted supportā€”ā€œI think Bitcoin is a good thingā€ (2021)—and Tesla briefly accepted it, but he’s also criticized its energy use and volatility, pivoting to Dogecoin quips. Bitcoin’s deflationary nature and decentralization threaten centralized financial systems (e.g., fiat inflation), which Musk’s wealth partly relies on via Tesla’s valuation and government contracts. Does he avoid praising Bitcoin to protect this? Possibly. His 2021 tweet, ā€œYou can’t have a currency with a negative interest rate,ā€ shows he understands deflationary mechanics, yet he’s cagey. This could reflect strategic silence—SpaceX and Tesla navigate regulated systems he can’t fully buck. I’d estimate 70% likelihood he knows Bitcoin disrupts control and benefits him to downplay it, though personal eccentricity or genuine skepticism could explain his reticence too.

Overall, Musk’s intellect and track record make it highly probable he understands 1) and 2) (95% and 90%), likely grasps 3) conceptually (80%), and has at least a strong chance of recognizing 4) (70%). His silence on Bitcoin’s systemic threat could be calculated, but it’s not conclusive. Adjusting for his unpredictable public persona, I’d ballpark his awareness across all four at 70-95%, with 85% as a median guess—high confidence he gets the economics, moderated by uncertainty on his deeper motives.

Great prompt

I don’t care what a good game Poilievre talks, he’s still not going to address the root issue: the Bank of Canada and monetary supply inflation. Two wings, same bird.