Replying to Avatar sudocarlos

nostr:npub1zafcms4xya5ap9zr7xxr0jlrtrattwlesytn2s42030lzu0dwlzqpd26k5 noticed you were asking mullvad about lightning payments in their github issues. Found that after typing up with lightning just now. Do you know when they added that?? I don't think it was there last month...

Mullvad now accepts LN directly via kraken

nostr:nevent1qqs2cxrzm78um4zu6a4hwkwddgsvcq92qlw56xucazlnu8kjrejfp0spz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygqrvy4sawhqajxnqqcugs96pplln0gk993dl7aykmszrmz2l4cjzcpsgqqqqqqsfc4g64

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This...Is... Awesome

pay for it with zaps

Do they do monero?

Yes, and one should use it for buying an anonymous VPN.

Kraken has a well connected LN node. You can bet they share all data with chainanalytic companies. Like all other major exchange LN nodes.

The chosen custodial setup is a degradation of network wide privacy. It hurts LN, but than Mullvad also is accepting other transparent coins.

Excellent but that breaks some of my privacy so I'll keep using the lightning voucher thing

How does it break privacy?

Lightning is private for the sender.

I have a channel with Kraken so I'm pretty sure if I sent it in one hop from my node it would be easy to figure out. Not that anyone is likely trying right now.

Only the sender knows the total LN fees paid & total hops.

All their node would see is your node providing the final hop to pay the invoice.

Oh I see - Kraken doesn't know it's the last stop. You're right!

But now they've heard of my plan... 😂

The channel being unannounced would make a difference.

And how many other channels does Zach have? Are they unannounced or public? I think there's more nuance.

You could first route the payment through another channel.

Not in all cases but that's generally correct.

"Our channel capacity is limited" 🤦‍♂️

I don't know what that means nor why it is silly to say.

Also, on the face of it, "LN directly via kraken" is self-contradictory. If it's direct, it wouldn't be "via" anybody.

Who said "silly"? I just think they should set themselves up for success rather than be unable to accept all of the ln⚡️ payments users want to send. They might not be able to properly track demand for ln⚡️ as a result.

I misunderstood one of your emoji. I don't know much about lightning. What is the tradeoff they are doing here by limiting channel capacity? Why wouldn't a channel limit by default be "all the bitcoin"? Or is there some other constraint I don't understand?

plugged in to the future. Love to see it

Finally!

Finally!

Ayoooooooo!

KYC node?

Thoughts on ivpn

IVPN is a good company. They have accepted Lightning directly for years.

One channel partner? That seems weird

There's a cost to running a node and they probably don't want the added complexity.

Looks like they are running a private node (payee node pubkey is not found in lightning graph) with an unannounced / private channel to Kraken.

POG

lol sorry... just noticed I was to slow after pressing send

...and BCH 🥴

I understand it like, that this means they still think Craig is Satoshi...

I don't want my VPN having a hang for scammers. Just my two sats.

btw, there are companies in this sector, who were accepting lightning years in advance.

This is some good news 🔥

the via kraken Is misleading, it's just a route hint , they just opened a channel to kraken

dont know his handle but thanks for sovereign engineering for his work so far!

My experience using Mullvad has progressively worsened. I am constantly blocked from ChatGPT and forced to log in, and I am completely unable to use my Youtube alternatives like FreeTube.

Ledn.io blocks 100% of all Mullvad traffic too.

What are other people's experiences and workarounds?

I dont believe MullVad. Tried for couple of months - the are controlled and save logs I think