Things you should not be angry about:
- Other peoples sexuality
- Other peoples politics
- Other peoples religious beliefs
Things you should be angry about:
- Genocide
- The Epstein files
- Totalitarian surveillance
- The cost of living crisis
Thank you for your attention to this matter
INB4 āEggs are $200 bc people in california are dyeing their hair blueā and āCharlie Kirk is dead bc his roommate didnt like vaginasā
Yep, it's not the people, it's not even their ideas, it's their actions
I vote for reintroduction of accountability for all, for me AND for thee
Ma'am you forgot the caps lock.
Old but gold powers' diversionary tactics?
Can't you dislike peoples' sexuality, politics, beliefs? I think you can. What you cannot is to use any kind of coercitive action ('legal' or illegal) to limit their freedom as long as their actions don't limit yours.
Ideas with ideas, actions with actions?
People in power love to fight ideas with actions. Don't they?
Ma'am, please don't tell me what to be angry about, my doctor said it's bad for my blood pressure.
I tend to get angry when my internet connection is slow. But on the bigger picture, it doesnāt really matter that much I guess š¤·š¼āāļø
Sure, I only get angry about the first three if they're to be forced upon me but I always get angry about latter four.
To be clear, people expressing themselves in your immediate vicinity is not forcing things on you
Of course it isn't, I'm only talking about the use of government violence to coerce people to actively participate.
Can you name an example of that
When I was in government school, we were forced to attend church on certain holidays, I have never been baptized and don't belong to any religion so I was angry that I was made to participate.
So far I have never been forced to participate in any sexual activities against my will so no complaints there.
And the restrictions based on other people's politics to what I'm allowed to do with my body and property are too numerous to count, I'm sure you , like everyone else, have lots of grievances in that department as well.
Interesting, I agree with this
That's why I am for the separation of state and religion
Sure, I agree, I mean I'm for the separation of state and society but by extension, that would include the separation of any churches, clubs, guilds, and all other forms of peaceful, voluntary association from the organized violence of the state š¤·āāļø
... because say what you will about the church but they, unlike the state, never forced me to attend mass.
It really isn't complicated, people ...
Although itās not sexuality that people take issue with(there are only theee choices anyway), itās gender identity and that is affecting quite a lot of people, mainly biological females. The fact that I had to qualify that last sentence by actually stating ābiologicalā, should be an indication of the seriousness of this issue.
Other peopleās politics are why we currently have a felon in the White House.
Religion has also gotten quite a few people killed so I wouldnāt write that off so easily either.
You donāt have to get angry, but you shouldnāt act as if they have no affect on those around you, if not you. Iām not willing to stick my head in the sand until any of those creep up and bite me in the ass.
As far as what I should be angry about, it doesnāt do any good to get upset over something I have no control over.
I canāt stop Netanyahu from committing war crimes.
I am more concerned about democracy eroding in realtime in favor of fascism, than I am about the sexual exploits of our elected felon.
I canāt get Cheeto Hitler out of the White House for at least theee more years, impeachment means nothing when you control the senate, as proven by his first two impeachments.
All I can do to make my money stretch, is convert it to bitcoin and hope people accept that..
I agree with most of this, but some points need important āifs,ā while others I absolutely disagree with.
Things I agree with, but with conditions (āifsā):
- Sexuality ā I donāt care who sleeps with who, as long as both sides consent. But there are situations where āconsentā is questionable, like with minors or people who are mentally unwell. In those cases, itās not real consent, and that matters.
- Epstein files ā If they contain proof of crimes, they should absolutely be acted on. But doxing victims or people who werenāt involved in the crimes is wrong. Release the files, but protect victims and those not guilty of anything.
Things I absolutely disagree with:
- Politics ā Politics arenāt just a personal matter; they affect everyone. If someone holds extreme political views and acts on them at the ballot box, that impacts the whole society. Ignoring dangerous politics just gives more space for extremism, whether left or right.
- Religious beliefs ā Same as politics. Religion shapes decisions, especially on election day. If people push religion into politics or try to impose their beliefs on others, that affects all of society. Thatās something worth being angry about.
nostr:note1nxz884ecezm8lfhq6wyzl24tmmpdrdekxsayqkfhcsxne85kdtdqrzd92d
It's not sexuality that most people care about, it's the fascistic propagation of it, and crushing of those who speak against that movement.
The term āfascistic propagationā is a definitional self-contradiction
Feel free to come back when you figured out what the words you are using mean
Thanks for stopping by though
1) Lesbo detected.
2) No it isn't. All fascistic movements are propagated fascistically. First through regulated media, right through to state mandated schooling and "hate speech" imprisonment for those who speak against it.
"You may not be interested in * but * is interested in you" applies to all thimgs "you should not be angry about"
Stop using the state to push sexual deviance on me and my children and we good š
Are they making you and your children gay?
Interesting that I mentioned sexual deviance and YOU bring up gay.
And yes, they're teaching filth and pornography as part of the curriculum in schools now, its well documented.
The sexualisation of childen is being pushed as policy from the UN down.
I mean you have a convicted rapist as president who protects his elite friends who where involved in child sex trafficing. He was probably even involved himself.
So it does indees sound like the protection of the rights of women and children is not a priority in the US currently.
šÆšÆ
Some leftist take on reality here which completely missed the point and is out of touch
Figures
Another propaganda account to muteš
Also to be angry about:
- people with PhDās convincing young children/teens to mutilate their genitals when they are too young to vote or get a tattoo š¤·š»āāļø
nostr:note1nxz884ecezm8lfhq6wyzl24tmmpdrdekxsayqkfhcsxne85kdtdqrzd92d
Turning a blind eye wonāt help save these childrenā¦ whatever helps you sleep at night.
Iām sorry to hear youāve been brainwashedā¦ Iāve seen disturbing videos of children who have gone through the process, I wonāt repost because they are young children. You can find them if you care to learn about reality.
(To clarify, the videos just show their facesā¦ but regardless I will respect their privacy)
Defends child abuse, then refuses to elaborateā¦ perhaps itās worth reexamining who here is brainwashed.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsw5suam7szpavgzueetaevym8kl74z7msy65fmmjd3vedq5r8ldmsuddymn
If other people sexuality is being forced upon my under age children. I have every right to be angry, and that anger is righteous.
Same with their politics, and their religious beliefs.
Gm. āļø
don't you think some of those need a little more context like lets go with your first one, other people sexuality. When that involves children, young people that aren't old enough to do a lot of things but their parents or schools feel its in their best interest to mutilate them and pump them full of drugs that will change their lives for ever I think we should be worried. When people are forced to be a part of someone who is confused about their sexuality expose themselves to children or the opposite sex thats a problem.
So I don't agree with you on that one.
nostr:note1uq7gg2lj5l8knr6x5u7n5vtjpttvmx4aj5renurpvsamcpk76zmscxkxz6
So were you calling for the Epstein files a couple of years ago? Or did that all of a sudden pop up on your radar because thats what you were fed?
Simpletons .... look at the shiny object over here now because we want you to pay attention..... lol
This is shit. Telling people what they should worry about. š¤”
Any statement of should is an imposition of one's value system onto someone else
Yeah she sounds woke and entitled.
Man you are speaking my mind. A healthy person doesnāt have āshouldā in their vocabulary. I could speak for hours on this.
Please š speak on this. People who donāt consider the āshouldsā are typically unbalanced IMLE.
I have and I'm currently writing a book chapter on the subject š¤
https://open.spotify.com/episode/6j7hI6YzTTykhXIqx2l4Jr nostr:nprofile1qqs2klv3wpgz22yav9y6m84p40zvunzf24wlwxgy72gnds3r0p02dacpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcymtesp
Wookiefoot nailed it like usual:
Coool
Should is fine but it should probably go with an āifā. Often times the if statement is left out , and then it becomes the vague imposition if a value system.
Like āif you want your dough to rise faster, you should put it in warm humid environmentā. Nothing wrong w that
Yeah sure. It can get pedantic. For people I aim to use could instead, along with encouragement instead of direction. And in your example āitā, eg āif you want the dough to rise faster, it needs to be in a warm humid environmentā, that way itās presented as an opportunity for the person to own without an implication of being wrong, the focus is on the dough not them.
My thinking is more or less that of Adler, and his ideas of horizontal not vertical relationship structures.
Other people's politics will kill you.
Other people's religious beliefs will kill you.
Other people's sexuality will kill you.
Learn to fight back or become extinct.
Politics lead to totalitarianism.
Religious beliefs lead to genocide (as seen by what is happening to the Druze in Syria).
If you would be angry at the cause you might avoid the outcome
What they tell me to worry aboutā¦
VS
What I actually worry about: not having enough bitcoin
The irony of putting āthank you for your attention to this matterā is well played. š
You shouldn't tell other people how to live; Here, let me tell you how to live.
š¤š
exactly. what a clown
Things you can control vs. things you cannot.
Perfectly said. Anger should be fuel for justice, not wasted on someoneās personal choices. Focus the fire on the systems destroying lives, not the freedoms that make life worth living. š§”š§”š§”šš
š INCORRECT.
Things you should not be angry about:
- That which is distant from or outside of your control or ability to directly verify.
Things you should be angry about:
- Violence, theft or control over things that are naturally granted to you or created by you.
This is a principled approach. Donāt just agree with opinions on subjective topics. Principles donāt change with the news, like the subjective topics chosen in this OP, allowing you to make proper judgments regardless of current circumstances. For example:
āOther peoples sexualityā can be forced upon you and your loved ones threatening violence, theft or control over things that are naturally granted to you or created by you.
you should be angry about that.
You should not be angry about distant topics for which you cannot directly verify are any threat to you. Donāt get up in arms about Eurasia attacking Oceania if you canāt directly verify that itās real. You should instead question or ignore the āMinistry of Truthā pushing the information on you.
Except it's all about politics. The politics of YOUR MONEY.. It is the only issue. The private sector economy has a giant leech on it's back. This is what the fighting is all about. The Democrat wants your money. They're getting violent now because they see that no one wants to live under their Totalitarian boot and be forced to pay for that boot. They cannot live without your money. If they did, they'd be Conservatives. Cost of Living, about money.. Totalitarian surveillance, gov't bureaucrats. Your money paying them.
i want to agree with you because i like pussy but reality is that Genocide and Religion go hand in hand ...
nostr:nprofile1qqsy67zzq5tc9cxnl6crf52s4hptdwhyaca5j7r8jwll535tdadedvcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68yurvv438xtnrdaksz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyctwvsq3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7atzthp: that reminded me about your news. Thank you for focusing on what really matters š
The rest is just a distraction indeed. Thanks to you
Don't tell me I can't be angry about someone else's politics like they aren't going to the ballot box and voting threats of violence against me and my family.
- Iām quite angry about men competing in womenās sport worldwide
- Iām frustrated that in the USA, the DNC have lost their mind and are normalizing extremism against those on the right
- Iām very worried that many European countries have set in motion a slow moving but inexorable path to Islamic authoritarianism
You come across like a scolding 16 year old.
i don't go in for having people tell me how i should feel and what i should be mad about.
