Come chill. We're getting drunk and blowing stuff up. Like the founding fathers intended.
Happy 4th y'all πππ
Getting very close to the next #grain πΎ release. Extensive documentation, logging, development and test suite also with entire nostr client reference impl on top with 30+ API endpoints.
Stay tuned. π«‘
I really wanted nip46. Just got it working. That was the 3rd attempt. And the first attempt was actually 59274028 attempts. π
This worked https://github.com/greenart7c3/ndk-bunker-example/blob/main/src%2Fapp%2Fpage.tsx
nostr:npub1w4uswmv6lu9yel005l3qgheysmr7tk9uvwluddznju3nuxalevvs2d0jr5 gave me that.
I'll be adding this support next. Thanks for the tip
I do not have nip46 implemented yet. I fear I will fail a few times too π
Direct interactivity with amber is NIP55
Bunker is an optional thing in amber. You can link your bunker to amber.
GM βοΈ
64 more miles and I'll have 300,000 mi on my truck
I've been working on grain, pretty much all by myself for over a year. And I'm an engineer! Not a software engineer though. π
It's hard to not run out of steam sometimes. It takes a conscious effort to keep grinding.
That's why I set up uptime for wheat recently. So that a year from now, I can talk about how the last commit was a day ago and how wheat has a 99% uptime.
Amber login is difficult... But I think I got it π
#Grain πΎ client is pretty fast too.
nostr:nprofile1qqs827g8dkd07zjvlhh60csytujgd3l9mz7x807xk3fewge7rwlukxgpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejz772u5wm https://video.nostr.build/d03daaf5d283982d8b189fd666c2b841fd9c1339bc2bea1bc6a28c84c88a43ac.mp4
Where all my external signers at (bunker)
I'ma need you to test my bunker login before I release the next version of grain.
What would you think about implementing this in #grain
Payment Models
1. Pay-Once Model
- Description: Single payment for permanent relay access
- Use Case: Users who want lifetime access
- Implementation: Simple whitelist addition after payment confirmation
2. Subscription Model
- Description: Time-based access with prorated refunds
- Use Case: Users who want temporary access with flexibility
- Features:
- Configurable duration (days, months, years)
- Prorated refunds based on unused time
- Automatic whitelist removal on expiry
- Immediate refund processing
3. Pay-Per-Use Model
- Description: Credit-based system with per-event charges
- Use Case: Light users who want granular control
- Features:
- Deposit system with balance tracking
- Per-kind pricing (different costs for different event types)
- Event Category-based pricing (regular, replaceable, etc)
- Real-time balance deduction
- Withdrawal of unused credits
80k? Where do you get that from? I just use my own domain and node but I'm curious
Get in the truck and go to fiat mine. Coffee then work.
πΎ grain has a status page now!
https://0ceanslim.github.io/grain/
It's also in the readme for the project now with some badges :)
Just make sure your family knows where your 12 words are. Simple.
Antonopoulos puts it the best. Individuals don't need two of three spending authority. Individuals should just need redundancy. So back up your single key multiple places.
25gb is not enough to hold the chain. So I hope you're run a pruned node!
Central banking, right out of the Communist Manifesto.
Mobile os is so confusing to me... I mean I get it but it's like layers of unix.
Ahhhh.... Okay I see. As far as how they interact with a web app though do you have to do anything special for a safari extension? Or is the nostr.window all the same.
Looks pretty yummy. How's it taste?
Si vis pacem, para bellum
nostr:nprofile1qqszrdqezqk63lqt4yzgftkfxjl4tdatea67akeezf8g6a0yj86p5hsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9u6a9ftk your thumb link is broken on this badge. 404
I'm not saying you're wrong. I remember bashing my head against the wall making a quick client for myself when badges.page didn't work for me. Just curious what you dislike about it or how you think it should have been speced
Why so? If it is, let's make a new one. Badges are really cool. And they can be used as a permissioning system or achievements too.
But you have to pay back the fiat you borrowed... That's just gambling on Bitcoin price within the loan term.
In other words, leverage.
Not inherently bad, but inherently more risky. You could end up stacking less sats in the end. What's the potential gain? 5% more than you borrowed? Not worth it for the risk and the headache if you ask me.
I love it. Better than fdroid and obtanium.
What the hell are you talking about. Opinions are my own. Are yours?
