Avatar
Neigsendoig Cocules
d9a329afabb263a8af216838eb45e1f04cc3000704464947c4b907e1bef580d7
German-American partial Khazar, Independent vibe emanator, Free Software philosopher, Pro-Am gamer, musical composer, tech and gaming tutor, and host of the Nëïgsëndöïg Cöcülës Show on YouTube and Wavlake. Also the originator of the #ttrpgstr tag. Hobbies: gaming (video games, board games and TTRPGs), music production, creative writing, AI shenanigans (Stable Diffusion and RP), GNU/Linux, Free Software (not just Open-Source), chatting wit people, content creation (vibe emanator), podcasting, spirituality (Chaldean numbers of 7 [legal name] and 9 [Pseudonym]), numerology, and gematria. Highly spiritual, black and white opinions (No gray area), and a potential reaper of souls in the coming harvest (the mass exodus of the Roman Catholic Church, the Jesuit Order of the Society of Christ, and their rituals). DM for more details on where to research.

That could be hard to do if one doesn't know what their doing with their AI setup. It could work for me, though I'd need to do something with Ollama and Shakespeare.

I've contacted my congresspeople to vote 'Nay' on these things, as have many others. I know it may not work, but effort would certainly work well. It has in the past, and I'm sure it'll be worth the effort.

Sure, I could see the issues with that, since KYC is something that's wholly unnecessary in the first place. That said, I avoid KYC at all when possible.

That looks to be an old form of Aramaic, which comes from the first beast kingdom, Babylon. The Hebrew we have today is derived from Aramaic, whereas the old Hebrew came from Phoenician.

There are many of these writers from different centuries, specifically the 16th-19th centuries by many Protestant Christians (some of them followed a solar Sabbath on Saturdays or Sundays) who measured the temple, and realized the Roman Catholic Church was the harlot (Martin Luther was one of the first to do this).

Historicists believe that revering (forehead) and obeying (right hand) the Popes, knowingly, is the Mark. Billions of people do this, though unknowingly as of right now (Catholicism had not become mandatory yet). WWIII, however, will force people to see Rome for what it is: Mystery, Babylon the Great, the city upon seven hills. People will leave Catholicism for anything that isn't Papacy-approved.

The Jesuit Order thought of this (since they're the ones who contrived it), and will enforce Catholicism as the one-world religion. This will be the Mark of the Beast. People will know it, and most won't accept it, knowing how this works. Here are some ways you take the Mark by obeying the Pope: Saturday or Sunday Sabbaths instead of lunar Sabbaths, futurism or preterism instead of historicism, practicing Zionism, communism, or National Socialism, and reading Bible versions overseen by the Vatican (NIV, ESV, LST, NLT, NJKV, NASB, even ASV to name a few) to monkey with the Word of Yevah.

From the looks of things, I wonder how much of a data center Derek has, knowing how bald he is. Maybe his hair happened to have limited that capacity a bit in that discipline.

#RoastDerek nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424

Replying to Avatar Иван

That take is common, but it doesn’t hold up very well when you look at how people actually use AI tools in practice.

1. **Effort isn’t only manual labor**

Creating good AI-generated content still requires effort—just a different kind. You have to:

- Understand exactly what you want to say

- Craft precise prompts (often dozens of iterations)

- Curate, edit, fact-check, and personalize the output

- Combine it with original photography, video, design, or voice

A lazy person just types “make me a viral post” and hits share. Most people who consistently post decent AI-assisted content are putting in real work; it’s just upstream of the final pixels rather than in Photoshop for six hours.

2. **The “real art” gatekeeping is selective**

People have been using tools to reduce manual effort forever and we stopped caring when the results got good:

- Photographers use Lightroom presets and AI culling → still photographers

- Musicians use Auto-Tune, drum samples, and loop packs → still musicians

- Writers use Grammarly, spell-check, and now LLMs for drafts → still writers

Nobody accuses a photographer of “not caring” because they didn’t develop film in a darkroom. The goalposts move once the tool becomes ubiquitous and the output is indistinguishable or superior.

3. **Sometimes AI is the only way some people can express themselves at all**

- Non-native speakers using AI to write fluent captions

- Disabled creators who can’t draw or type fast but have strong ideas

- People with limited time (parents, full-time workers) who still want to share thoughts or memes

Dismissing their posts as “zero effort” ignores that the effort barrier was lowered so they could participate in the first place.

4. **Purely hand-made low-effort slop has always existed**

Phone screenshots, copy-pasted tweets, 5-second TikTok reactions, blurry memes made in MS Paint—tons of popular content was always “zero effort” by traditional craft standards. AI just made the ceiling higher for people who do care, while the floor (lazy garbage) looks shinier now.

Bottom line: judging effort by how much was done without tools is like judging a chef’s skill by how many things they grew in their backyard. The final dish is what matters, and AI is now just another kitchen appliance. Some people use it to microwave trash; others use it to plate Michelin-level ideas they never could have executed manually. You can dislike the aesthetic or the flood of content, but “they don’t care” is usually projection.

It surely is good effort and good prompting that makes AI art look real, and not sloppy. I've done this myself, and I prompted pretty nicely myself.

#GE, y'all.

So it turns out I have a network issue that prevented me from posting the Podcast 2.0 version of my podcast episode that released yesterday. I figured it out by circumventing whatever the flip was happening, using my mobile data, and then logging into nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqyfg0d955c2jrj2080ew7pa4xrtj7x7s7umt28wh0zurwmxgpyj9sldm58v to publish it.

Oh, and the book nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqghwaehxw309anhymm4wpejuvrcvd5xzapwvdhk6qpq5879mltlln6k8jy32k6xvagmtqx3zhsndchcey8gjyectwldk88sn9ng7t wrote is being covered for four weeks straight (in increments of 4 laws for each part).

Welp, it looks like Wavlake isn't loading on Firefox-based browsers at the moment. I wondered if they're getting DDoS'd.

Hey, nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqyfg0d955c2jrj2080ew7pa4xrtj7x7s7umt28wh0zurwmxgpyj9sldm58v, y'all might want to look into this issue. It might be me being stupid, or it's not working on Firefox for some reason.

Thanks for proving to myself and Sokio that you've shifted blame away from the Pope.

Jews are enslaved by Rome and the Vatican, as they allowed themselves to be in this position. The Mark of the Beast is sucking papal cock by revering and/or obeying him, point blank.

Rev. 13 shows for a fact what the Roman Catholic Church's leadership does in their ceremonies. Is that not exactly what Rev. 13 described?

You know they're fake due to Catholic and Jesuit bankrolling. Every... single... one. They have to suck Catholic and/or Jesuit dick in order to be relevant to the masses.

Some notable peeps left out here are Stew Peters and his crew, Steven and Janna Ben Nun of Israeli News Live, and Mike Adams and his crew. They're all Catholic scumbags, and push hard for taking the Mark of the Beast in different but insidious ways (reverence and obeisance to the Pope).

He doesn't, because he's a useful Catholic idiot.

No Catholic wants that. Why do you think we have the political slop we do? It comes from Rome, as the Vatican is the religious and political capital of the world. It's called that for a reason.

Americans aren't getting a CBDC probably until 2032 at the latest, and stablecoins are being regulated with the GENIUS act (Jack Spirko talked about this in his podcast).

Absolutely not. Not KYC'ing, not doxxing myself.

Replying to Avatar Helen Yrmom

This I've beeen strivong for, full stop.

That empire is from Rome, which is in stage 3. Their guns and bloodshed will be nothing compared to what we had from 66-70 AD, during stage 1.

I wouldn't mind actually doing trying DC20 and 2E, since 2E is crunchy (not as much as 1E though), and DC20 is actually interesting.

Isn't your podcast, The Story Game, using a heavily modified DC20 deal?

I've played a bit as a DM/GM (I hate DM'ing 5e). However, I always wanted to do Basic Fantasy Role-Playing Game (BFRPG), which is like B/X but with ascending armor class.

GA, y'all.

I'm currently utilizing nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejz7qpq0r8xl2njyepcw2zwv3a6dyufj4e4ajx86hz6v4ehu4gnpupxxp7s85uvay for testing purposes as a means to see how things would work if Android were to go full fascist on us with this whole digital ID thing (thanks to Catholic leadership and Jesuit rulers) for anyone utilizing Android.

I'll report back with progress as of thus far.

I happened to be a podcaster who tries to get people AWAY from most mainstream technology.

That's my calling, and I'm sticking to it.

Where would this be enforced, though?

I'm also not buying any GTA game, since you don't own it unless you have a console or physical PC release. Or you can just pirate it (which I still won't do regardless).

I do other things other than gaming, such as writing (using Obsidian), podcasting (using Wavlake as my host), numerology and many more things that don't require gaming.

That's just what I do, and I'd be happy to help with any of these things I mentioned.

GE, y'all.

I just got an email for my YouTube email (cisn-droid at Proton Mail in particular), apparently talking about this individual named Xianqiang Zhang, who is apparently an alien abductee.

Mr. Zhang allegedly lived on an alien planet in 1985, specifically for one month, and once he came back, he would share his experience for over 40 years.

Could somebody do some research on this to see if this is true? Apparently, this would be before the US UAP Act pacces (which apparently, I'm being told that it will).

Oh, and the individual who sent me the email offering this is Xiang Li. The email does lead to a legitimate site for Mr. Zhang, and I'm apparently one of a few people chosen to collaborate (potentially) with Mr. Zhang, either with a deep dive or an interview.

I want to know y'all's thoughts on this.