Avatar
Kevin Alfred Strom
c355e199632d69b799f6d2fcf672ca2de553b912f6eba11513907ae12d372ec5
Writer, publisher, broadcaster, free thinker. Our destiny is in the stars. Was at https://twitter.com/kevin_a_strom since 2014, terminated under Musk in 2023 within hours of an ADL demand. I prefer to use NOSTR, but I am also sometimes found on https://gab.com/kevinstrom Mathematics, physics, and genetics are the real words of God.

People also do not, I think, have the "human right" to extort taxes from objectors to pay for the public indoctrination pens where children are force-fed insane and harmful ideologies, nor to require "attendance" therein. As for vaccines, no more for my family. I trust the pharma vultures to help our health about as much as I trust Benjamin Netanyahu to help Palestinians

It will probably be inscribed on my tombstone. But I've said a lot of other, equally important things too.

You're making a lot of assumptions about me, but that's okay, my writing isn't always as clear as it should be. I agree that there are many factors involved. But certainly if the value systems and leaders of those societies had group survival as their absolute top priority, they would be doing whatever is necessary to raise their birth rates -- and forbidding the entry of other races. I am not aware that any of the nations you mentioned are expressly doing that, nor exalting group survival as their value above all other values (as they should be doing). So I think the principle stands.

Replying to Avatar Suhail

What all people of all backgrounds should be concentrating on is ending the Jewish domination of other people's countries. I'm White, and I want my people to survive and have our own territory. Every people wants that. What makes the Jewish power structure different from all others is that they want to dominate other people's countries. And DO NOT kid yourself: The Jewish power structure DOES NOT consider Jews to be White. They hate White people. They are a race unto themselves.

Yes, the UK is heavily Jewish-run today, something I've been pointing out for decades. They also were on the side of anti-White, anti-European, anti-Russian Communism in that war. As was the despicable Roosevelt administration in the US. Insults ignored.

Replying to Avatar cryptowolf

Britain’s fate is decline, not upheaval – and history explains why

Protests in London will change nothing – Britain’s people were bred to endure

By Timofey Bordachev, Program Director of the Valdai Club

The demonstrations in London earlier this month – up to 150,000 people protesting immigration and government incompetence – drew attention in Russia and abroad. Some observers even wondered if Britain might finally be approaching a breaking point. Perhaps, like Nepal or France in past years, mass anger could reshape politics.

But such hopes are misplaced. Britain will never experience revolutionary upheaval. Its culture is not one of defiance but of endurance. The United Kingdom has, over centuries, become a bastion of injustice disguised as stability, where ordinary people are conditioned to accept their powerlessness. This cultural inheritance, once an imperial advantage, now guarantees slow decline.

Britain is unique in Western Europe: it was created not through union or invitation, but through conquest. In 1066 Norman knights crushed the native English and divided the land into fiefdoms. Unlike Russia, where foreign warriors were invited to defend the realm, or Hungary, where nomads fused with locals to form a people, England’s story was one of subjugation.

That pattern hardened in 1215, when barons forced King John to sign the Magna Carta. Propaganda later elevated the charter as the foundation of English liberty. In reality it entrenched oligarchy: the power of the wealthy over crown and people alike. Where monarchs elsewhere often stood with peasants against feudal tyranny, in England the crown itself was shackled by landowners. Injustice became not an aberration but the system’s operating principle.

Geography reinforced the pattern. For centuries there was no frontier of freedom. Only in 1620 did dissenters finally flee on the Mayflower, planting English settlements in North America. By then, 600 years of endurance had shaped a national character: patient, fatalistic, and resigned.

In Russia, by contrast, peasants had begun migrating east as early as the 11th century. Freedom was found in movement: new villages, new lands, and eventually a new people. This restless expansion created Russia’s unique statehood and ethnic identity. The English, trapped on their island, cultivated instead a tradition of enduring injustice.

By the 18th century, Britain was sending its sons to wars around the world. They returned crippled, if at all – as Rudyard Kipling later immortalized. Yet they went meekly. A society drilled in obedience did not question orders, however insane. That made Britain dangerous abroad, but docile at home.

Popular uprisings were crushed without hesitation. Laws such as the Settlement Act of 1662, tying workers to their parishes, or the Poor Law of 1834, abolishing basic relief, stripped away rights. Only after 1945, under pressure from the USSR’s example, did Britain adopt limited welfare protections. Even these are now eroding, with no real resistance.

English political thought gave this tradition a theory. Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan argued that justice is irrelevant – the strong impose order, and citizens must submit. This was the philosophical foundation of the English state: not a monarch above all, but oligarchs enthroned above monarch and people alike. Rousseau, in continental Europe, offered the opposite vision – government as the executor of the people’s will.

In Russia, even the poorest peasant was equal before the tsar in principle, if not always in practice. In Britain, the wealthy were not equal before the state; they were the state. That remains the essence of British governance today.

These centuries shaped habits that persist. A German journalist once remarked that Britain is the only country where the elite can get away with anything. Brexit proved the point: through manipulation and distortion, the ruling class reversed the nation’s strategic course and bound it permanently to the United States.

London retains its role as a financial hub, but capital flight is steady. Wealthy Britons leave even as the government insists on its “global” status. The common people, meanwhile, trudge on. They are heirs to a culture that equates submission with virtue. Protests may fill the streets, but the outcome is always the same: patient resignation, followed by business as usual.

This tradition once gave Britain its edge. Armies could be raised, colonies conquered, wars fought with little domestic dissent. But in the modern world, where political vitality depends on public will, the same habit of resignation has become a liability.

Unlike Russians, who carved out freedom by settling new lands, or French and Germans, who rebelled and migrated, the English learned to endure. Their legacy is a society where injustice is not challenged but accepted – and where any hope of transformation evaporates before it begins.

Britain’s rulers remain reckless, and therefore dangerous abroad. They still pour resources into supporting Kiev while neglecting their own population. But the trajectory is clear: slow, irreversible decline born of strategic incompetence and a people conditioned to bear it.

That is why, whatever the size of the protests, Britain will never experience a revolution. Its people were conquered in 1066, bound by oligarchs in 1215, tied to parishes in 1662, stripped of relief in 1834 – and taught through it all that injustice is simply the way of things.

Today, as feudal habits finally wither across the world, Britain remains their museum piece. It will not explode; it will simply fade.

This article was first published by Vzglyad newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team.

https://www.rt.com/news/625054-britains-fate-is-decline/

Weird article. To make the claim that in 1945 (when millions were being raped and slaughtered by the heavily-Jewish-run Soviet Union) that "under pressure from the USSR’s example" ( ! ) people did good things is a bizarre reversal of reality. I love Russia and Russians, but their government needs to abandon their totally false myth that the Soviets were on the side of good in World War 2. Communism was and is anti-Russian specifically and anti-White generally.

I'm sure that, as a broadcast engineer and writer, I am not the best one to answer questions about whale communications -- but I have heard that there is an ocean layer called the Deep ocean Channel or something like that, which acts as a waveguide for very low frequency sounds.

Nature and simple logic show that this is true: "Peoples which refuse to practice identity politics are peoples who disappear from this Earth." (This has been discussed extensively by the philosopher David Sims.)

If your people has a moral system in which there is anything else -- freedom, wealth, pleasure, adherence to a religious book, anything -- that is placed HIGHER in value than the survival of the group, then there will always eventually come a situation in which a choice must be made between survival of the group or adhering to that allegedly "higher" value. And, if the other thing is chosen, then the practitioner group of that moral system is not going to survive. Groups which always choose survival of the group as their highest value do survive.

After many, many weeks of reading, I have yet to see one single lucid answer to this question that is screaming to be asked:

What massive Bitcoin emergency is there right now -- or could there ever be -- that "requires" us to massively and suddenly change the protocol to allow endless 100 kB chunks of slop on our blockchain?

Also: I advise being skeptical of the motivations of "influencers" who refuse to at least ask this very fundamental question.

Older White men, if they are honorable and care about our race's future, can be a great resource for our resurgence by becoming fathers later in life. Not only have they presumably acquired some wisdom that helps them be great partners in family-formation, but they often have resources that can be no better utilized than for that sacred purpose. Additionally, they have usually had very few vaccines and zero mRNA shots, meaning that their genetic material is closer to being pure and natural than average.

So many problems in European and European-derived societies can be traced to the fact that, in the last few generations, White people simply didn't have enough babies.

I like the understanding that comes from reading people who see the world very differently than I, getting inside their heads and really getting it.

The illegitimate elite have decided that there are too many of us cattle and are culling us in a hundred different ways, not the least of which is by redirecting the sex instinct to get satisfaction in ways that do not result in the birth of children, especially White children, whom they especially hate.

By framing their propaganda to make childlessness seem "moral," they are also causing the more gullible and well-meaning and good-hearted and responsible among us to have fewer and fewer children with each passing generation, leaving the irresponsible, cynical, cunning, and hard-hearted to inherit the Earth.

Saving the current monetary system is pretty much equivalent to rescuing plague viruses.

Color of skin and race are two different things. There are races, for example, in New Guinea and sub-Saharan Africa that have essentially the same skin color but are as different genetically as two races can be. Skin colors in Japan overlap those in Europe to some degree, but those races have been evolving apart for tens of thousands of years. But don't kid yourself: Race is highly significant; racial "equality" is non-existent; and racial divergence is necessary for human evolution to continue.

If they play ads, they should be forced to vacate the non-commercial part of the FM band from 88 to 92 MHz.

Boycotting Israel should be legal. In some contexts it is now punishable and forbidden in the US.

Working to preserve your nation's racial integrity should be legal. In many countries it is not.

I am very passionate, but I try to be diplomatic, since so many otherwise good people have been propagandized since birth by the Jewish power structure, its media, and the churches and schools it dominates. Many of these folks are salvageable. Even non-White people should be able to grasp that racial panmixia is bad and that it is being promoted by the same Tribe that is blasting and burning innocent moms, dads, and babies to death every single day.

To be bigoted is to persist in an opinion or judgment which is contrary to the facts. It is a fact that individuals, nations, peoples, and races are different in many ways that have nothing to do with skin color. A Scandinavian's skin color may be somewhat different from a Sardinian's, but both are of the same race and share very recent ancestry. Some Japanese have skin colors that overlap with Europeans' but are nevertheless a distinctly different race. Australoids have the same skin color as sub-Saharan Africans, but are not at all the same race. So skin color has almost nothing to do with it. It is a matter of evolutionary divergence which manifests itself not only externally but also mentally, psychologically. To try and force diverging races back together is profoundly unnatural, anti-evolution and thus anti-Life, and is also as certain to cause violent conflict and social dysfunction as would forcing hyenas, wolves, and beagles into the same enclosure.

Gains can usefully be measured against 9-bedroom easily defensible houses on 25 acres, far away from our utterly destroyed and captured cities.

1956 alternative newspaper: "The Coming Red Dictatorship: Asiatic, Marxist Jews Control the World." Maybe those radical racial-nationalists were onto something before you were born.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/297523438552

CNN is owned and run mainly by Jews. Once you have confirmed that I speak the truth, investigate the ownership of other major media, hedge funds, banks, and other rapacious instititutions.

Despite your continued insults, which I'll ignore, I do appreciate your explaining your point of view. Although I grant that Jews are an intelligent race on average, I don't think that explains their fantastically dominant position in the White-hating media, usury, or the multiple degenerate, destructive movements which they seem to produce like misty summer mornings produce poison mushrooms. I think there is also a psychological and behavioral difference: a greater racial loyalty, coupled with an almost supernatural ability to gauge (and manipulate) the feelings and thoughts of others. Andrew Hamilton's article "Empathy Without Sympathy" captures part of the picture, I think. I also think it's fair to see the Jewish community as a whole as strongly opposed to the continued survival of the European race.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/07/empathy-without-sympathy-2/

Also worth reading is John I. Johnson on Hayek's ancestry:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/10/friedrich-hayek-and-the-jews-part-2-of-3/

If the Earth were flat, FM stations from Oahu would come in strong in the Hollywood hills every day of the week. Since they don't, the Earth is not flat.

To provide the physical basis for the evolution of consciousness. And one purpose of consciousness is to create the next material world when this one reaches its end.

Therefore the job of the new leadership stratum will be to make doing the wrong thing instantly and extremely painful.