Avatar
FernandoTheKoala
e13490fd23435a3c9b536e18e8309e9fd95475bf72a477b1166f2d4c651a2e63
Just a man who is very curious, loves to learn and discuss ideas

Yep, I also reached the same conclusion after trying and trying again talking to normies. They won’t act until they are in deep pain. At this point I hope the pain come sooner rather than later, let’s get done with it and move forward for the love of god!

It was meant for the masses but I have realized that they are way worse than we all thought. They are scared, they don’t want responsibility and don’t want to learn anything new.

At this point I believe btc adoption will be driven by the 1% that have the right mentality (openess, creativity, drive, which are shared way more by the wealthy that the masses). The masses will get btc only when it is absolutely “safe” and when the wealthy will have gathered most of it

Looking on the bright side we still get a world on a bitcoin standard, it’s just a shame that the masses wasted such opportunity

Replying to Avatar Gigi

GM

Hey Gigi a curiosity of mine: do you find these all these GM/GN pics or you generate them yourself with AI?

Yes but Marc has to be experienced live, his energy is out of this world !!!

Check this out if you haven't already: https://youtu.be/MGJZfmYMltM

I was arguing just the other day that we cannot call modern music “music”.

Music (the old one) is where actual people with actual talent (they can play instrument and sing) got together and created everything together.

Today “musicians” cannot sing (they use autotune) and most of the time the instrumental music is machine made and not human-made. There is no human talent and no human chemistry anymore (often individuals musicians can be ok, but when put together their chemistry make them amazing, I feel like this is lost)

So let’s call modern music “neo-music” or whatever, but calling it music is an insult to actual music and it has nothing to do with creating art and having talent anymore

I remember someone saying “most ppl are boring, they don’t do anything interesting and so they have nothing to hide”.

This is also the feedback I got when talking with ppl, nobody sees the danger of having freedom of speech/interaction controlled

Replying to Avatar A₿del fgu

Hear me out, PONS: Proof Of Non-Spam for Bitcoin!

I was discussing with nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk about various usage of ZKP for Bitcoin, and he came with this intriguing idea to use Zero Knowledge Proofs to fight spam on Bitcoin (without breaking some designs such as BitVM).

Initially I was sceptical, but the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that it could be a very interesting idea to explore.

Just to be concrete, here are some examples of valid / non spam materials that could be theoretically proven via a system like PONS:

- Schnorr public keys: Prove knowledge of corresponding private key

- Hash preimages: Prove knowledge of data hashing to claimed values

- Taproot scripts: Prove leaf scripts are valid Bitcoin Script, not arbitrary bytes

- Merkle roots: Prove correspondence to actual Merkle trees of valid elements

As usual, I like to experiment and play with ideas, so I started to implement a proof of concept of this idea, for the minimalistic simplest example here that is: prove that a public key is "real" and not a "fake" public key.

You can see in the demo video below the following flow:

- Generate a Schnorr public key and its corresponding private key

- Create a digital signature of an arbitrary message

- Run a Cairo program that verify the signature against the public key

- Generate a STARK proof of the Cairo program execution using STWO prover

- Verify the STARK proof using STWO verifier

Sorry Luke Dashjr I know that you consider Rust as a woke language haha, but for now we have the STWO prover and verifier only implemented in Rust, so I used it for the demo. We can easily integrate the STWO verifier in Bitcoin Core or Knots via ffi though (as we already did in another POC).

So of course here it's completely overkill to use a STARK proof for this and you could do it much more efficiently without a ZKP, but it is to show how the architecture could look like end to end.

There are many interesting design questions, like how to make nodes / miners play nicely and prioritise transactions with valid proofs, how to incentivise the generation of proofs, how to make it efficient and not bloated, etc.

I am curious to hear your thoughts on this idea, and if you think it could be a good idea to explore further.

I’m not knowledgeable enough to contribute, but just wanted to support with a comment 👍🏼

I sold it at 149 (bought at 40) knowing it would have gone way higher because I didn’t want to be a part of it.

My sister told me I’m a retard and should have just made money and fuck ethics. Am I delusional ?

Replying to Avatar Gigi

GN

May we all have the best of sleep tonight

Replying to Avatar Richard Martin

What I Learned from Running a Lightning Node

I set up a Lightning node because I wanted to understand how it really works, not just in theory, but in practice. I was curious about the mechanics, the tradeoffs, and whether it made sense to integrate it into my regular Bitcoin use.

After a few weeks of running it, here’s what I’ve learned.

It Works—But It’s a Lot of Work

Technically, it functioned as advertised. But the operational overhead quickly became obvious:

-You need to keep the node online 24/7.

-You have to open channels and decide who to peer with.

-You need to manage liquidity—both inbound and outbound—which is its own ongoing job.

-If you want decent routing success, you need to monitor and rebalance channels regularly, or automate it with scripts and tools that have their own learning curves.

It’s learnable. But it’s just constant. And for someone who has limited expertise, time and other priorities, it quickly starts to feel like a low-value use of attention.

What Actually Makes Sense (For Me)

In the process, I realized that running a Lightning node doesn’t make much sense for my actual needs. What does make sense is a layered, practical setup:

-Custodial LN wallets are fine for small, everyday payments where convenience matters more than control. I treat these like digital cash—fast, simple, and low-stakes. That’s what I have with the Primal wallet.

-Non-custodial LN wallets are a good option for holding moderate amounts of spending Bitcoin while still retaining control of the keys.

-For larger amounts or infrequent use, sticking with regular on-chain Bitcoin and a well-managed cold wallet with additional hot wallet setup if required remains the best balance of simplicity and security.

Running a Lightning node only makes sense if I were actively routing payments, running a lightning service, or doing something that really required deep integration and control. I’m not doing any of that, so why burn the time?

Takeaway

I didn’t stop because it was too hard. I stopped because I learned enough to know it’s not the right tool for how I actually use Bitcoin.

The experiment gave me exactly what I wanted: clarity. And that was worth it.

I said it once and I will say it again: you are a cool dude

(And yes, you can quote me to your kids 😂)

Nope, absolutely no change in sight and no acknowledgement that they might have communicated/handled the whole thing in a much better way (which is really what a lot of people wanted after this whole thing).

Seems like this episode woke a lot of people up in 1) taking action to run a node, and 2) realizing we cannot depend wholly on core, we need more alternatives

Oh, and Peter Todd has somehow became even more insufferable

I do, but I'd like to be safe in case a massive emergency happens and I need a quick emergency fund (still I get you man, super annoying to keep more fiat than necessary lol)

Then it’s great news that the increase is not due to Theter joining in, because when they will do it is gonna be another huge increase

maybe they are suppressing price through derivates?

it makes sense the theory of "they'll supprese the price until they have accumulated enough, then they'll let it rip"

The second definitely yes

The first I feel it varies

I respectfully disagree, I think we already witnessed enough examples of how if the money and financial incentives are broken we cannot take advantage of technological advancement.

How many cure for health diseases are not widely and cheaply available when they could be? How many researches/studies are not taken because you cannot patent them and make a huge profit out of it? And like good old Jeff Booth reminds us “if AI is controlled by the few, it will not be in the service of bettering humanity as a whole”

Loved the episode anyway, peeeace

🪧 Just a pawn czeching Kingtillionaires.

That’s the sign I held up at the end of Michael Saylor’s keynote nostr:npub167n5w6cj2wseqtmk26zllc7n28uv9c4vw28k2kht206vnghe5a7stgzu3r.

Not for attention — but for alignment.

Not to provoke — but to reveal.

I didn’t come to clap for corporate alchemists leveraging fiat debt to hoard Bitcoin.

I came to remind the room that **Bitcoin wasn’t made for the kings**.

It was made for us — the pawns who move.

---

### ♟️ *Real Life Chess*

Some would say my life is a mess,

But they don’t know,

that I’m playing chess.

And although freedom is nice,

It doesn’t come,

without sacrifice.

My opening move,

Is finding the groove,

Then I developed the skills,

That gives tyrants the chills.

Satoshi’s my guide,

While I move like a knight,

Dodging the banksters in black,

While I plan my attack.

Pawn checks King,

Then rook takes pawn,

Another wise rabbit appears at the spawn.

As kings, queens and bishops fight for the center of attention,

One pawn has come through,

with a genius invention,

That changes the structure of the current convention,

And propels us forward into another dimension.

This invention transformed the board from Chess into Go.

Please enter the realm of the eternal flow.

Now hierarchies crumble,

And as I watch the cunts

of the black army stumble,

I look for the signal within all the scrumble,

the eternal pulse says:

**"Stack sats and stay humble."**

With the endgame in sight,

we switch black to white.

We follow the light,

We trust our might.

Then we meet our queen,

Feel suddenly seen,

And gracefully live,

in the between.

It might be Go it might be Chess,

But one thing is certain,

**It’s a beautiful mess.**

---

This poem isn’t just a metaphor.

It’s a **roadmap** for the pleb who chooses dignity over dependence.

It’s a mirror held up to a Bitcoin culture that’s forgetting its roots in favor of Wall Street cosplay and applause for Cantillonaires.

Because let’s call it what it is:

Debt-financed Bitcoin buys are **Proof-of-Stake in fiat**.

They are not heroic. They are opportunistic.

They are not revolution. They are reallocation — from the center of power, using the tools of that power.

But #Bitcoin doesn’t belong to boardrooms.

It belongs to the builders, the miners, the teachers, the sovereign individuals, the ones who gave something up to *earn* something real.

It belongs to those who make *the move*.

---

### ✊ So here’s the move:

🛠️ Build outside the gatekeepers. nostr:npub1s0veng2gvfwr62acrxhnqexq76sj6ldg3a5t935jy8e6w3shr5vsnwrmq5

🚫 Refuse applause for fiat leverage.

📣 Disrupt the narrative.

🎯 Use non-violent direct action to **check power**, wherever it hides.

🧠 Stay sharp. Stay sovereign.

⚒️ Stack work. Not just sats.

Because the endgame isn’t a new pig on a throne.

The endgame is *you*, awake and aware,

transforming from pawn to queen,

and *watching the kings fall* — not through violence, but by **moving better**.

---

Bitcoin doesn’t need another billionaire.

It needs a billion plebs playing with intention,

moving through sacrifice,

flowing through the mess,

and building the future from the ground up.

We’re not here to crown a king.

We’re here to **flip the board**.

#PlebCheck

#ProofOfWork

#CheckTheKing

#NonViolentDirectAction

#RealLifeChess

#StackSatsAndStayHumble

This is for the builders, the plebs, the poets, the radicals, and the knights who still move sideways in a rigged game.

Tagging a few, to reach more plebs:

nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx nostr:npub1g53mukxnjkcmr94fhryzkqutdz2ukq4ks0gvy5af25rgmwsl4ngq43drvk nostr:npub1qg8j6gdwpxlntlxlkew7eu283wzx7hmj32esch42hntdpqdgrslqv024kw nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424

I don’t get all this “love” for Saylor in the comments and in the btc community in general. The guy surely did some good spreading message and orange pilling, but I think all the good he’s done is completely unintentional.

I mean, I don’t think he gives 2 fucks about creating a better world with btc and pushing humanity to a better future, he’s just interested in becoming massively rich and influential (unless I missed some interviews of him where this side comes out?)

To me it was crazy how at btcPrague there was a huge crowd to take pictures with him, while uncle rockstar was freely walking around devoid of crowd